首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery >Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis (UKOA): Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) or High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO)?
【2h】

Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis (UKOA): Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA) or High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO)?

机译:单室膝关节骨性关节炎(UKOA):单室膝关节置换术(UKA)或高胫骨截骨术(HTO)?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this review article is to analyze the results of high tibial osteotomy compared to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. The search engine used was PubMed. The keywords were: “high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty”. Twenty-one articles were found on 28 February 2015, but only eighteen were selected and reviewed because they strictly focused on the topic. In a meta-analysis the ratio for an excellent outcome was higher in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than high tibial osteotomy and the risks of revision and complications were lower in the former. A prospective comparative study showed that unicompartmental knee arthroplasty offers better long-term success (77% for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and 60% for high tibial osteotomy at 7-10 years). However, a review of the literature showed no evidence of superior results of one treatment over the other. A multicenter study stated that unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis without constitutional deformity should be treated with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty while in cases with constitutional deformity high tibial osteotomy should be indicated. A case control study stated that unicompartmental knee arthroplasty offers a viable alternative to high tibial osteotomy if proper patient selection is done. The literature is still controversial regarding the best surgical treatment for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (high tibial osteotomy or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty). However, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty utilization is increasing, while high tibial osteotomy utilization is decreasing, and a meta-analysis has shown better outcomes and less risk of revision and complications in the former. A systematic review has found that with correct patient selection, both procedures show effective and reliable results. However, prospective randomized studies are needed in order to answer the question of this article.
机译:本文的目的是分析单室膝关节骨关节炎患者与单室膝关节置换术相比高胫骨截骨术的结果。使用的搜索引擎是PubMed。关键词为:“胫骨高位截骨术与单室膝关节置换术”。 2015年2月28日发现21篇文章,但仅选择和审查了18篇文章,因为它们严格专注于该主题。在荟萃分析中,单室膝关节置换术的优良结果比高胫骨截骨术高,前者发生翻修和并发症的风险更低。一项前瞻性比较研究表明,单室膝关节置换术可提供更好的长期成功率(在7-10岁时,单室膝关节置换术为77%,高胫骨截骨术为60%)。但是,文献综述显示,没有证据表明一种治疗优于另一种治疗。一项多中心研究表明,单房膝关节置换术应治疗无结构性畸形的单室膝关节骨关节炎,而在有结构性畸形的情况下,应指示高胫骨截骨术。一项病例对照研究表明,如果正确选择患者,则单室膝关节置换术可提供一种可行的替代方法,以替代高胫骨截骨术。关于单室膝关节骨性关节炎(高胫骨截骨术或单室膝关节置换术)的最佳手术治疗方面的文献仍存在争议。然而,单室膝关节置换术的利用率正在增加,而胫骨截骨术的利用率正在下降,并且荟萃分析显示前者的结局更好,翻修和并发症的风险更低。一项系统的审查发现,正确选择患者后,两种方法均显示出有效和可靠的结果。但是,需要前瞻性随机研究来回答本文的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号