首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Asian Journal of Andrology >Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:腹腔镜内窥镜单点手术与常规腹腔镜精索静脉曲张切除术的手术效果及术后患者经验比较:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical effect and patient experience of laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy (LESSV) and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. The candidate studies were included after literature search of database Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Related information on essential data and outcome measures was extracted from the eligible studies by two independent authors, and a meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study design (RCT and non-RCT). The odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to estimate the outcome measures. Seven articles were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that patient who had undergone LESSV had a shorter duration of back to work (overall: SMD = −1.454, 95% CI: −2.502–−0.405, P = 0.007; non-RCT: SMD = −2.906, 95% CI: −3.796–−2.017, P = 0.000; and RCT: SMD = −0.841, 95% CI: −1.393–−0.289, P = 0.003) and less pain experience at 3 h or 6 h (SMD = −0.447, 95% CI: −0.754–−0.139, P = 0.004), day 1 (SMD = −0.477, 95% CI: −0.905–−0.05, P = 0.029), and day 2 (SMD = −0.612, 95% CI: −1.099–−0.125, P = 0.014) postoperatively based on RCT studies. However, the meta-analyses based on operation time, clinical effect (improvement of semen quality and scrotal pain relief), and complications (hydrocele and recurrence) yielded nonsignificant results. In conclusion, LESSV had a rapid recovery and less pain experience over conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two varicocelectomy techniques in terms of the clinical effect and the incidence of hydrocele and varicocele recurrence. More high-quality studies are warranted for a comprehensive conclusion.
机译:进行本荟萃分析,以比较腹腔镜内镜下单点精索静脉曲张切除术和常规腹腔镜下精索静脉曲张切除术的临床效果和患者经验。在对数据库Cochrane Library,PubMed,EMBASE和MEDLINE进行文献检索之后,纳入了候选研究。两名独立作者从符合条件的研究中提取了有关基本数据和结果测量的相关信息,并使用STATA 12.0软件进行了荟萃分析。通过研究设计(RCT和非RCT)进行亚组分析。使用比值比(OR)或标准均值差(SMD)及其95%置信区间(95%CI)来评估结果指标。我们的荟萃分析包括七篇文章。结果表明,经历过LESSV的患者恢复工作的时间较短(总体:SMD = −1.454,​​95%CI:−2.502–−0.405,P = 0.007;非RCT:SMD = −2.906,95% CI:−3.796–−2.017,P = 0.000; RCT:SMD = −0.841,95%CI:−1.393–−0.289,P = 0.003),在3 h或6 h时的疼痛经历更少(SMD = -0.447, 95%CI:−0.754-−0.139,P = 0.004),第1天(SMD = −0.477,95%CI:−0.905–−0.05,P = 0.029),以及第2天(SMD = −0.612,95%CI :−1.099–−0.125,P = 0.014)根据RCT研究得出。但是,基于手术时间,临床效果(改善精液质量和改善阴囊疼痛)和并发症(鞘膜积液和复发)的荟萃分析未见明显意义。总之,与传统的腹腔镜精索静脉曲张切除术相比,LESSV恢复快且痛苦少。但是,两种精索静脉曲张切除术之间的临床效果以及鞘膜积液和精索静脉曲张复发的发生率在统计学上均无统计学差异。需要进行更多高质量的研究以获得全面的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号