首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Asian Journal of Andrology >Optimal management of prostate cancer with lethal biology – state-of-the-art local therapy
【2h】

Optimal management of prostate cancer with lethal biology – state-of-the-art local therapy

机译:利用致命生物学手段对前列腺癌进行最佳治疗–最新的局部疗法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Defining prostate cancer with lethal biology based upon clinical criteria is challenging. Locally advanced/High-Grade prostate cancer can be downstaged or even downgraded with cure in up to 60% of patients with primary therapy.,,,, However, what is known is that high-grade prostate cancers have a greater potential for recurrence and progression to metastatic disease, which can ultimately result in a patient's death. Patients with clinical features of “high-risk” prostate cancer (cT2c, PSA >20, ≥ Gl 8 on biopsy) are more likely to harbor more aggressive pathologic findings. The optimal management of high-risk prostate cancer is not known as there are not prospective studies comparing surgery to radiation therapy (RT). Retrospective and population-based studies are subject to many biases and attempts to compare surgery and radiation have demonstrated mixed results. Some show equivalent survival outcomes while others showing an advantage of surgery over RT.,,,, Local therapy for high-risk disease does appear to be beneficial. Improved outcomes realized with local therapy have been clearly demonstrated by several prospective studies evaluating androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone versus ADT plus RT. The combination of local with systemic treatment showed improved disease-specific and overall survival outcomes.,, Unfortunately, primary ADT for N0M0 prostate cancer is still inappropriately applied in general practice. While the surgical literature is largely retrospective, it too demonstrates that surgery in the setting of high-risk prostate cancer is effective in providing durable disease-specific and overall survivals.,href="#ref3" rid="ref3" class=" bibr popnode tag_hotlink tag_tooltip" id="__tag_524503644">3,href="#ref15" rid="ref15" class=" bibr popnode tag_hotlink tag_tooltip" id="__tag_524503676">15
机译:根据临床标准用致死生物学定义前列腺癌具有挑战性。在高达60%的接受初级治疗的患者中,局部晚期/高级别前列腺癌可以通过治愈而降级,甚至降级。,但是,已知的是,高级前列腺癌具有更大的复发潜力和进展为转移性疾病,最终可能导致患者死亡。具有“高危”前列腺癌(cT2c,PSA> 20,≥Gl 8活检)临床特征的患者更有可能表现出更具侵略性的病理发现。由于尚无前瞻性研究将手术与放射治疗(RT)进行比较,因此尚不知道高危前列腺癌的最佳治疗方法。回顾性研究和基于人群的研究存在许多偏差,尝试比较手术和放疗的结果喜忧参半。有些显示出相同的生存结果,而另一些显示出手术优于RT的优势。对于高危疾病,局部治疗确实是有益的。几项前瞻性研究评估了单独使用雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)与ADT加RT的比较,已清楚地证明了采用局部疗法可改善治疗效果。局部治疗和全身治疗的结合显示出改善的疾病特异性和总体生存结果。,不幸的是,用于N0M0前列腺癌的原发性ADT仍未在一般实践中应用。尽管外科手术文献在很大程度上是回顾性的,但它也表明,在高危前列腺癌的环境中进行手术可有效提供特定疾病的持久性和总体生存率。href =“#ref3” rid =“ ref3” class = “ bibr popnode tag_hotlink tag_tooltip” id =“ __ tag_524503644”> 3 ,href="#ref15" rid="ref15" class=" bibr popnode tag_hotlink tag_tooltip" id="__tag_524503676"> 15

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号