首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Asian Journal of Andrology >Active surveillance for prostate cancer: when to recommend delayed intervention
【2h】

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: when to recommend delayed intervention

机译:积极监测前列腺癌:何时建议延迟干预

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There are no agreed upon guidelines for placing patients on active surveillance (AS). Therefore, there are no absolute criteria for taking patients off AS and when to recommend treatment. The criteria used to define progression are currently based on prostate specific antigen (PSA) kinetics, biopsy reclassification, and change in clinical stage. Multiple studies have evaluated predictors of progression such as PSA, PSA density (PSAD), prostate volume, core positivity, and visible lesion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Furthermore, published nomograms designed to predict indolent prostate cancer do not perform well when used to predict progression. Newer biomarkers have also not performed well to predict progression. These findings highlight that clinical and pathologic variables are not enough to identify patients that will progress while on AS. In the future, with the use of imaging, biomarkers, and gene expression assays, we should be better equipped to diagnose/stage prostate cancer and to distinguish between insignificant and significant disease.
机译:没有关于将患者置于主动监护(AS)的共识指南。因此,没有绝对的标准可以使患者退出AS以及何时推荐治疗。用于定义进展的标准目前基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)动力学,活检重新分类和临床阶段变化。多项研究评估了进展的预测因素,例如多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)上的PSA,PSA密度(PSAD),前列腺体积,核心阳性和可见病变。此外,用于预测惰性前列腺癌的已发表列线图在用于预测进展时效果不佳。新型生物标志物也不能很好地预测进展。这些发现突出表明,临床和病理学变量不足以识别将在AS期间进展的患者。将来,通过使用影像学,生物标志物和基因表达分析,我们应该能够更好地诊断/分期前列腺癌,并区分轻度和重度疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号