首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research >Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy of L5–S1 disc herniation: a comparison between intermittent endoscopy technique and full endoscopy technique
【2h】

Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy of L5–S1 disc herniation: a comparison between intermittent endoscopy technique and full endoscopy technique

机译:经皮内镜下L5–S1椎间盘突出症椎板间盘切除术:间歇性内镜技术与全内镜技术的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundPercutaneous endoscopic laminar discectomy is a typical minimally invasive discectomy operation that is classified into the percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy and the percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy. Based on whether the surgeon chooses to deal with the ligamentum flavum under endoscope guidance, percutaneous endoscopic discectomy by the interlaminar approach can be performed with a full endoscope technique with the intermittent endoscope technique. To our knowledge, there is no study comparing these two techniques in regard to their surgical effects and advantages. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the cost, safety, and efficacy between the intermittent endoscopy technique and full endoscopy technique of endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy at the L5–S1 level.
机译:背景技术经皮内镜层状椎间盘切除术是典型的微创椎间盘切除术,其分为经皮内镜经椎间孔椎间盘切除术和经皮内镜内层间椎间盘切除术。根据外科医生是否选择在内窥镜引导下处理黄韧带,可以采用全内窥镜技术和间歇性内窥镜技术通过层间途径进行经皮内镜下椎间盘切除术。据我们所知,尚无研究比较这两种技术的手术效果和优势。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以比较在L5–S1级别的内窥镜下腰椎间盘突出症的间歇性内窥镜检查技术和完全内窥镜检查技术之间的成本,安全性和有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号