首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research >Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique versus open microdiscectomy for single-level lumbar discectomy: a multicenter retrospective analysis
【2h】

Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique versus open microdiscectomy for single-level lumbar discectomy: a multicenter retrospective analysis

机译:单侧双门内镜技术与开放性微盘切除术治疗单水平腰椎间盘突出症的临床比较:多中心回顾性分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique is a minimally invasive procedure for spinal surgery, while open microscopic discectomy is the most common surgical treatment for ruptured or herniated discs of the lumbar spine. A new endoscopic technique that uses a UBE approach has been applied to conventional arthroscopic systems for the treatment of spinal disease. In this study, we aimed to compare and evaluate the perioperative parameters and clinical outcomes, including recovery from surgery, pain and life quality modification, patient’s satisfaction, and complications, between UBE and open lumbar microdiscectomy (OLM) for single-level discectomy procedures.
机译:背景技术单侧双门内镜(UBE)技术是脊柱外科手术的一种微创手术,而开放式显微椎间盘切除术是治疗腰椎椎间盘破裂或突出的最常见手术方法。使用UBE方法的新内窥镜技术已应用于常规关节镜系统以治疗脊柱疾病。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较和评估单级椎间盘切除术在UBE和开放式腰椎间盘切除术(OLM)之间的围手术期参数和临床结果,包括手术恢复,疼痛和生活质量的改善,患者的满意度以及并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号