首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Basic and Clinical Andrology >Man is not a big rat: concerns with traditional human risk assessment of phthalates based on their anti-androgenic effects observed in the rat foetus
【2h】

Man is not a big rat: concerns with traditional human risk assessment of phthalates based on their anti-androgenic effects observed in the rat foetus

机译:人不是大老鼠:基于在大鼠胎儿中观察到的邻苯二甲酸盐的抗雄激素作用对传统邻苯二甲酸盐的人类风险评估感到担忧

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Phthalates provide one of the most documented example evidencing how much we must be cautious when using the traditional paradigm based on extrapolation of experimental data from rodent studies for human health risk assessment of endocrine disruptors (EDs). Since foetal testis is known as one of the most sensitive targets of EDs, phthalate risk assessment is routinely based on the capacity of such compounds to decrease testosterone production by the testis or to impair masculinization in the rat during foetal life. In this paper, the well-established inhibiting effects of phthalates of the foetal Leydig cells function in the rat are briefly reviewed. Then, data obtained in humans and other species are carefully analysed. Already in January 2009, using the organotypic culture system named Fetal Testis Assay (FeTA) that we developed, we reported that phthalates might not affect testosterone production in human foetal testes. Several recent experimental studies using xenografts confirm the absence of detectable anti-androgenic effect of phthalates in the human foetal testes. Epidemiological studies led to contradictory results. Altogether, these findings suggest that phthalates effects on foetal Leydig cells are largely species-specific. Consequently, the phthalate threshold doses that disturb foetal steroidogenesis in rat testes and that are presently used to define the acceptable daily intake levels for human health protection must be questioned. This does not mean that phthalates are safe because these compounds have many deleterious effects upon germ cell development that may be common to the different studied species including human. More generally, the identification of common molecular, cellular or/and phenotypic targets in rat and human testes should precede the choice of the toxicological endpoint in rat to accurately assess the safety threshold of any ED in humans.
机译:邻苯二甲酸盐提供了最有据可查的例子之一,证明了使用基于啮齿动物研究的实验数据外推得出的传统范式进行内分泌干扰物(ED)人体健康风险评估时,我们必须谨慎的例子。由于已知胎儿睾丸是EDs最敏感的靶标之一,因此邻苯二甲酸盐风险评估通常是基于此类化合物在胎儿生命中降低睾丸睾丸激素产生或削弱大鼠男性化能力的能力。本文简要回顾了已建立的邻苯二甲酸盐对大鼠胎儿Leydig细胞功能的抑制作用。然后,仔细分析从人类和其他物种获得的数据。 2009年1月,我们已经使用我们开发的名为“胎儿睾丸含量测定”(FeTA)的器官型培养系统,报道了邻苯二甲酸盐可能不会影响人类胎儿睾丸中睾丸激素的产生。最近的一些使用异种移植物的实验研究证实,在人的胎儿睾丸中没有邻苯二甲酸盐的可检测的抗雄激素作用。流行病学研究导致矛盾的结果。总而言之,这些发现表明邻苯二甲酸盐对胎儿Leydig细胞的作用在很大程度上是种特异性的。因此,必须质疑干扰大鼠睾丸中胎儿类固醇生成的邻苯二甲酸盐阈值剂量,该剂量目前已被用于定义可接受的每日摄入量,以保护人类健康。这并不意味着邻苯二甲酸盐是安全的,因为这些化合物对生殖细胞发育具有许多有害作用,这可能是包括人类在内的不同研究物种所共有的。更一般地,在选择大鼠和人体睾丸中的常见分子,细胞或/和表型靶标之前,应先在大鼠中选择毒理学终点,以准确评估人体中任何ED的安全性阈值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号