首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research >Anterior-only stabilization using cage versus plating with bone autograft for the treatment of type II/IIA Hangman’s fracture combined with intervertebral disc injury
【2h】

Anterior-only stabilization using cage versus plating with bone autograft for the treatment of type II/IIA Hangman’s fracture combined with intervertebral disc injury

机译:仅前路稳定使用笼式钢板固定与自体植骨钢板固定治疗II / IIA型Hangman骨折合并椎间盘突出症

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundAnterior C2/3 discectomy and interbody fusion (ACDF) with plating is increasingly performed as the primary treatment of unstable Hangman’s fracture; however, plate-related complications, such as screw back-out, plate fracture and soft-tissue injury, is not uncommon. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage has now been developed to provide initial stability before fusion; however, whether and how ACDF with PEEK cage offer better clinical results compared with ACDF with plating in management of Hangman’s fracture remains unknown. This study compares the efficacy of ACDF with plating to that of ACDF with PEEK cage in management of type II/IIA Hangman’s fractures (according to Levine and Edwards classification) retrospectively.
机译:背景技术前路C2 / 3椎间盘切除术和带钢板的椎体间融合术(ACDF)越来越多地用作不稳定的Hangman骨折的主要治疗方法。然而,与钢板相关的并发症,例如螺钉退回,钢板断裂和软组织损伤,并不少见。现已开发出聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼,以提供融合前的初始稳定性;然而,与带板的ACDF相比,带PEEK笼的ACDF在行刑人道骨折方面是否以及如何能提供更好的临床效果。这项研究回顾性地比较了ACDF钢板与PEEK笼式ACDF在治疗II / IIA型Hangman骨折(根据Levine和Edwards分类)方面的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号