首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Ovarian Research >Discordant anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) among women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF): which one is the better predictor for live birth?
【2h】

Discordant anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) among women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF): which one is the better predictor for live birth?

机译:在进行体外受精(IVF)的女性中抗苗勒管激素(AMH)和促卵泡激素(FSH)不一致:哪一种是活产的更好预测指标?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThis study sought to clarify the roles of Anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) in predicting live birth, especially in patients with discordant AMH and FSH. A large IVF data set provided by eIVF®, consisting of 13,964 cycles with AMH, FSH, age, BMI, and birth outcomes were evaluated. Patients were categorized into four groups: Good prognosis group (AMH ≥1 ng/ml; FSH < 10 mIU/ml), Poor prognosis group (AMH < 1 ng/ml; FSH ≥10 mIU/ml), Reassuring AMH group (AMH ≥1 ng/ml; FSH ≥10 mIU/ml), and Reassuring FSH group (AMH < 1 ng/ml; FSH < 10 mIU/ml). The interaction between AMH, FSH, and their impact on live birth rate among these four groups was evaluated using Generalized Additive Mixed Modeling (GAMM).
机译:背景本研究试图阐明抗苗勒管激素(AMH)和促卵泡激素(FSH)在预测活产中的作用,尤其是在AMH和FSH不一致的患者中。由eIVF®提供的大量IVF数据集进行了评估,包括13964个周期,AMH,FSH,年龄,BMI和出生结局。患者分为四组:预后良好的组(AMH≥1ng / ml; FSH <10 mIU / ml),预后差的组(AMH <1 ng / ml; FSH≥10mIU / ml),安心的AMH组(AMH) ≥1ng / ml; FSH≥10mIU / ml),并确保FSH组放心(AMH

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号