首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Ovarian Research >Transparency in ovarian cancer clinical trial results: ClinicalTrials.gov versus PubMed Embase and Google scholar
【2h】

Transparency in ovarian cancer clinical trial results: ClinicalTrials.gov versus PubMed Embase and Google scholar

机译:卵巢癌临床试验结果的透明度:ClinicalTrials.gov与PubMedEmbase和Google Scholar

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIn recent years the question of the lack of transparency in clinical research has been debated by clinicians, researchers, citizens and their representatives, authors and publishers. This is particularly important for infrequent cancers such as ovarian cancer, where treatment still gives disappointing results in the majority of cases. Our aim was to assess the availability to the public of results in ClinicalTrials.gov, and the frequency of non-publication of results in ClinicalTrials.gov and in PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar. We collected all trials on ovarian cancer identified as “completed status” in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry on 17 January 2017. We checked the availability of the results in ClinicalTrials.gov and systematically identified published manuscripts on results.
机译:背景技术近年来,临床研究,研究人员,公民及其代表,作者和出版商一直在争论临床研究缺乏透明度的问题。这对于不常见的癌症(例如卵巢癌)尤为重要,在大多数情况下,治疗仍然令人失望。我们的目的是评估ClinicalTrials.gov对公众的可用性,以及ClinicalTrials.gov和PubMed,Embase和Google Scholar中未公开结果的频率。我们于2017年1月17日在ClinicalTrials.gov注册表中收集了所有被鉴定为“完成状态”的卵巢癌试验。我们在ClinicalTrials.gov中检查了结果的可用性,并系统地确定了已发表的结果手稿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号