首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Behavioral and Brain Functions : BBF >Differences in learning rates for item and associative memories between amnestic mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls
【2h】

Differences in learning rates for item and associative memories between amnestic mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls

机译:健忘性轻度认知障碍和健康对照者的项目和联想记忆的学习率差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundIt has been established that the overall performance of associative memory was disproportionately impaired in contrast to item memory in aMCI (Amnestic mild cognitive impairment) patients, but little is known about the specific aspects of the memory process that show differences between aMCI and healthy controls. By comparing an item-item associative learning test with an individual item learning test, the present study investigated whether the rate of learning was slower in associative memory than in item memory in aMCI. Furthermore, we examined whether deficits in intertrial acquisition and consolidation contributed to the potential disproportionate impairments in the learning rate of associative memory for aMCI patients. In addition, we further explored whether the aMCI-discriminative power of the associative memory test increases more than that of the item memory test when the number of learning-test trials increases.
机译:背景技术已经确定,与aMCI(失忆症轻度认知障碍)患者的项目记忆相比,联想记忆的整体表现受到了不成比例的损害,但是对记忆过程的具体方面知之甚少,这些方面显示了aMCI与健康对照之间的差异。通过将项目-项目联想学习测试与单个项目学习测试进行比较,本研究调查了联想记忆的学习速度是否比aMCI中的项目记忆慢。此外,我们检查了间质获取和合并的缺陷是否导致aMCI患者联想记忆学习率的潜在不成比例的损害。此外,我们进一步探讨了随着学习测试次数的增加,联想记忆测试的aMCI判别力是否比项目记忆测试的增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号