首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bioinformatics and Biology Insights >Accurate Classification of Differential Expression Patterns in aBayesian Framework With Robust Normalization for Multi-Group RNA-Seq CountData
【2h】

Accurate Classification of Differential Expression Patterns in aBayesian Framework With Robust Normalization for Multi-Group RNA-Seq CountData

机译:差异表达模式的准确分类具有鲁棒归一化的多组RNA-Seq计数的贝叶斯框架数据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Empirical Bayes is a choice framework for differential expression (DE) analysis for multi-group RNA-seq count data. Its characteristic ability to compute posterior probabilities for predefined expression patterns allows users to assign the pattern with the highest value to the gene under consideration. However, current Bayesian methods such as baySeq and EBSeq can be improved, especially with respect to normalization. Two R packages (baySeq and EBSeq) with their default normalization settings and with other normalization methods (MRN and TCC) were compared using three-group simulation data and real count data. Our findings were as follows: (1) the Bayesian methods coupled with TCC normalization performed comparably or better than those with the default normalization settings under various simulation scenarios, (2) default DE pipelines provided in TCC that implements a generalized linear model framework was still superior to the Bayesian methods with TCC normalization when overall degree of DE was evaluated, and (3) baySeq with TCC was robust against different choices of possible expression patterns. In practice, we recommend using the default DE pipeline provided in TCC for obtaining overall gene ranking and then using the baySeq with TCC normalization for assigning the mostplausible expression patterns to individual genes.
机译:经验贝叶斯是用于多组RNA-seq计数数据的差异表达(DE)分析的选择框架。它具有为预定义的表达模式计算后验概率的特征能力,使用户可以为所考虑的基因分配具有最高价值的模式。但是,可以改进当前的贝叶斯方法,例如baySeq和EBSeq,尤其是在标准化方面。使用三组模拟数据和实际计数数据比较了两个R包(baySeq和EBSeq)及其默认归一化设置以及其他归一化方法(MRN和TCC)。我们的发现如下:(1)在各种模拟情况下,贝叶斯方法与TCC归一化方法相比具有默认归一化设置的方法具有可比性或更好,(2)TCC中提供的用于实现广义线性模型框架的默认DE管道仍然有效当评估DE的整体程度时,该方法优于采用TCC归一化的贝叶斯方法,并且(3)具有TCC的baySeq对可能的表达模式的不同选择具有鲁棒性。在实践中,我们建议使用TCC中提供的默认DE管道来获得总体基因排名,然后使用带有TCC归一化的baySeq来分配最多单个基因的合理表达模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号