首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Biology Direct >Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants
【2h】

Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants

机译:不精确的内含子损失不及精确的内含子损失但在植物中并不罕见

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AbstractIn this study, we identified 19 intron losses, including 11 precise intron losses (PILs), six imprecise intron losses (IILs), one de-exonization, and one exon deletion in tomato and potato, and 17 IILs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparative analysis of related genomes confirmed that all of the IILs have been fixed during evolution. Consistent with previous studies, our results indicate that PILs are a major type of intron loss. However, at least in plants, IILs are unlikely to be as rare as previously reported.
机译:摘要在这项研究中,我们鉴定了19个内含子缺失,包括11个精确的内含子缺失(PIL),6个不精确的内含子缺失(IIL),1个去核化和1个外显子缺失,以及拟南芥中的17个IIL。相关基因组的比较分析证实,所有IIL在进化过程中均已修复。与以前的研究一致,我们的结果表明PIL是内含子丢失的主要类型。但是,至少在植物中,ILS不可能像以前报道的那样罕见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号