首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Biomarkers in Cancer >Associations of the A66G Methionine Synthase Reductase Polymorphism in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【2h】

Associations of the A66G Methionine Synthase Reductase Polymorphism in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:大肠癌中A66G蛋氨酸合酶还原酶多态性的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Inconsistency in the reported associations between the A66G polymorphism in the methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) gene and colorectal cancer (CRC) prompted a meta-analysis, so that we could obtain a more precise estimate. Databases searches of the published literature yielded 20 case–control studies from 17 articles (8,371 cases and 12,574 controls). We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals in three genetic comparisons (A allele, G allele, and A/G genotype). We found no evidence of overall associations between MTRR A66G and CRC risk (OR 0.96–1.05, P = 0.12–0.44). This was materially unchanged when reanalyzed without the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE)-deviating studies (OR 0.97–1.06, P = 0.11–0.65). In the A allele comparison, however, outlier treatment generated significant protection (OR 0.91, P = 0.01). Combined removal of the outliers and HWE-deviating studies reflected this summary effect (OR 0.90, P = 0.01) as did the pooled OR from high-quality studies (OR 0.90, P = 0.01). Only the Asian subgroup showed significant (both at P = 0.05) A allele (OR 1.13) and A/G genotype (OR 0.88) associations. In conclusion, post-outlier A allele effects were protective. Our study also suggests ethnic-specific associations with Asian susceptibility and protection in the A allele and A/G genotype comparisons, respectively. Folate status showed no association of this polymorphism with CRC.
机译:甲硫氨酸合酶还原酶(MTRR)基因的A66G多态性与结直肠癌(CRC)之间报道的关联性不一致,促使进行了荟萃分析,因此我们可以获得更精确的估计值。对已发表文献进行数据库检索,从17篇文章中获得了20例病例对照研究(8371例病例和12,574例对照)。我们在三个遗传比较中(A等位基因,G等位基因和A / G基因型)计算了合并的优势比(OR)和95%置信区间。我们没有发现MTRR A66G与CRC风险之间存在整体关联的证据(OR 0.96-1.05,P = 0.12-0.44)。在没有进行Hardy-Weinberg平衡(HWE)变差研究的情况下进行重新分析时,结果基本上没有变化(OR 0.97-1.06,P = 0.11-0.65)。但是,在A等位基因比较中,异常处理产生了显着的保护作用(OR 0.91,P = 0.01)。异常值的去除和HWE偏差研究的结合反映了这种汇总效应(OR 0.90,P = 0.01),高质量研究的合并OR也是如此(OR 0.90,P = 0.01)。仅亚洲亚组显示出显着(均P = 0.05)A等位基因(OR 1.13)和A / G基因型(OR 0.88)的关联。总之,离群值A等位基因效应具有保护作用。我们的研究还建议分别在A等位基因和A / G基因型比较中与亚洲人易感性和保护性相关的特定种族关联。叶酸状态表明该多态性与CRC无关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号