首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Biomaterials Research >Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting
【2h】

Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting

机译:实体器官制造:脱细胞与3D生物打印的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Solid organ fabrication is an ultimate goal of Regenerative Medicine. Since the introduction of Tissue Engineering in 1993, functional biomaterials, stem cells, tunable microenvironments, and high-resolution imaging technologies have significantly advanced efforts to regenerate in vitro culture or tissue platforms. Relatively simple flat or tubular organs are already in (pre)clinical trials and a few commercial products are in market. The road to more complex, high demand, solid organs including heart, kidney and lung will require substantive technical advancement. Here, we consider two emerging technologies for solid organ fabrication. One is decellularization of cadaveric organs followed by repopulation with terminally differentiated or progenitor cells. The other is 3D bioprinting to deposit cell-laden bio-inks to attain complex tissue architecture. We reviewed the development and evolution of the two technologies and evaluated relative strengths needed to produce solid organs, with special emphasis on the heart and other tissues of the cardiovascular system.
机译:实体器官的制造是再生医学的最终目标。自1993年引入组织工程技术以来,功能性生物材料,干细胞,可调微环境和高分辨率成像技术在促进体外培养物或组织平台再生方面做出了巨大努力。相对简单的扁平或管状器官已经在(临床前)试验中,并且市场上有一些商业产品。通往包括心脏,肾脏和肺在内的更复杂,需求更高的实体器官的道路将需要实质性的技术进步。在这里,我们考虑了两种用于制造固体器官的新兴技术。一种是尸体器官脱细胞,然后用终末分化或祖细胞重新种群。另一个是3D生物打印,以沉积载有细胞的生物墨水,以获得复杂的组织结构。我们回顾了这两种技术的发展和演变,并评估了产生实体器官所需的相对强度,特别强调了心脏和心血管系统的其他组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号