首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BJPsych Bulletin >Mental capacity legislation in the UK: systematic review of the experiences of adults lacking capacity and their carers
【2h】

Mental capacity legislation in the UK: systematic review of the experiences of adults lacking capacity and their carers

机译:英国的心理能力立法:对缺乏能力的成年人及其照顾者的经历进行系统的回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aims and method Capacity legislation in the UK allows substitute decision-making for adults lacking capacity. Research has explored the experiences of such adults and their carers in relation to the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000, and the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in England and Wales. A systematic review of the relevant research was performed using a framework method.>Results The legislation provided mechanisms for substitute decision-making which were seen as useful, but there were negative experiences. Decision-making did not always seem to follow the legislative principles. Awareness of the legislation was limited. Most research was qualitative and some was of low methodological quality. Data were too heterogeneous to allow comparisons between English and Scottish law.>Clinical implications Capacity legislation was generally viewed positively. However, some experiences were perceived negatively, and the potential benefits of the legislation were not always utilised.
机译:>目标和方法英国的能力立法允许成人缺乏能力的替代决策。研究已经探讨了此类成年人及其护理者在《 2000年成年人无行为能力(苏格兰)法》和《英格兰和威尔士2005年精神行为能力法》方面的经验。使用框架方法对相关研究进行了系统回顾。>结果该立法提供了替代决策的机制,该机制被认为是有用的,但也有负面经验。决策似乎并不总是遵循立法原则。立法意识有限。大多数研究是定性的,有些研究的方法学质量很低。数据太异类,无法在英国法律和苏格兰法律之间进行比较。>临床意义人们普遍对能力立法持积极态度。但是,有些经验被否定了,该立法的潜在利益并没有总是得到利用。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 BJPsych Bulletin
  • 作者

    Sam Wilson;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 2017(41),5
  • 年度 2017
  • 页码 260–266
  • 总页数 7
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号