首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Biology >Horizons in the evolution of aging
【2h】

Horizons in the evolution of aging

机译:衰老演进的视野

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Between the 1930s and 50s, evolutionary biologists developed a successful theory of why organisms age, firmly rooted in population genetic principles. By the 1980s the evolution of aging had a secure experimental basis. Since the force of selection declines with age, aging evolves due to mutation accumulation or a benefit to fitness early in life. Here we review major insights and challenges that have emerged over the last 35 years: selection does not always necessarily decline with age; higher extrinsic (i.e., environmentally caused) mortality does not always accelerate aging; conserved pathways control aging rate; senescence patterns are more diverse than previously thought; aging is not universal; trade-offs involving lifespan can be ‘broken’; aging might be ‘druggable’; and human life expectancy continues to rise but compressing late-life morbidity remains a pressing challenge.
机译:在1930到50年代之间,进化生物学家开发了一种成功的理论来阐明生物为何会衰老,并根植于种群遗传原理。到1980年代,衰老的发展已经有了可靠的实验基础。由于选择力随着年龄的增长而下降,衰老是由于突变的积累或对生命早期健康的益处而发展的。在这里,我们回顾了过去35年中出现的主要见解和挑战:选择不一定总是随着年龄的增长而下降;较高的外部(即环境造成的)死亡率并不总是会加速衰老;保守途径控制衰老率;衰老模式比以前认为的要多样化。衰老不是普遍的;涉及寿命的折衷可能会“中断”;衰老可能是“毒品”;人类的预期寿命不断提高,但压缩后期发病率仍然是一个紧迫的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号