首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Biotechnology >Comparison and transfer testing of multiplex ligation detection methods for GM plants
【2h】

Comparison and transfer testing of multiplex ligation detection methods for GM plants

机译:转基因植物多重连接检测方法的比较和转移测试

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundWith the increasing number of GMOs on the global market the maintenance of European GMO regulations is becoming more complex. For the analysis of a single food or feed sample it is necessary to assess the sample for the presence of many GMO-targets simultaneously at a sensitive level. Several methods have been published regarding DNA-based multidetection. Multiplex ligation detection methods have been described that use the same basic approach: i) hybridisation and ligation of specific probes, ii) amplification of the ligated probes and iii) detection and identification of the amplified products. Despite they all have this same basis, the published ligation methods differ radically. The present study investigated with real-time PCR whether these different ligation methods have any influence on the performance of the probes. Sensitivity and the specificity of the padlock probes (PLPs) with the ligation protocol with the best performance were also tested and the selected method was initially validated in a laboratory exchange study.
机译:背景技术随着全球市场上转基因生物数量的增加,欧洲转基因生物法规的维护变得越来越复杂。为了分析单个食物或饲料样品,必须同时以敏感水平评估样品中是否存在许多GMO目标。关于基于DNA的多重检测,已经发表了几种方法。已经描述了使用相同基本方法的多重连接检测方法:i)特异性探针的杂交和连接,ii)连接探针的扩增,以及iii)扩增产物的检测和鉴定。尽管它们都有相同的基础,但已公开的连接方法却截然不同。本研究使用实时PCR研究了这些不同的连接方法是否对探针的性能有任何影响。还测试了具有最佳性能的连接规程的挂锁探针(PLP)的灵敏度和特异性,并在实验室交换研究中初步验证了所选方法的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号