首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Neuroscience >In vitro resetting of the circadian clock in the Aplysia eye. III. Location of photoreceptors that signal continuous light to continuous darkness
【2h】

In vitro resetting of the circadian clock in the Aplysia eye. III. Location of photoreceptors that signal continuous light to continuous darkness

机译:海鸟眼中生物钟的体外复位。三向连续黑暗发出信号的感光器位置

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As shown in the previous two papers (Prichard, R.G., and M.E. Lickey (1981 a, b) J. Neurosci. 1: 835–839; 840–845), the circadian rhythm of compound action potentials (CAPs) from the Aplysia eye can be reset in vitro by single transitions from continuous light to continuous darkness (LL/DD). The magnitude of the reset depends on the duration of LL that precedes the LL/DD. When LL duration is 18, 21, or 24 hr, the magnitude of the reset is different if the eye is neurally attached to the brain than if it is neurally detached. The brain gives rise to optic efferent fibers that terminate in the retina. In the present paper, we explore how the optic efferents contribute to resetting by asking whether LL/DD is sensed by the photoreceptors known to exist in the brain or those in the eye. Eye-brain preparations were placed in a special recording chamber in which the eye and brain could be isolated photically from each other while one optic nerve remained intact. The LL/DD then was delivered to the eyes and to the brain at different times. During the separate illumination, neural communication between the eyes and brain was prevented by reversible nerve blockade. The magnitude of the resulting resets always corresponded to the duration of LL that was delivered to the eyes. Photoreceptors in the brain did not contribute effectively to resetting. Also, resetting was not disturbed by nerve blockade that began before LL/DD and lasted for more than 6 hr after LL/DD. This implies that information about the timing of LL/DD was stored in the eye for more than 6 hr before it was expressed in the form of a reset. We conclude that the efferent fibers in the optic nerve do not instruct the eye about the magnitude of the reset. Instead, they activate or modulate circadian functions that are latent in the eye itself.
机译:如前两篇论文(Prichard,RG和ME Lickey(1981 a,b)J. Neurosci。1:835-839; 840-845)所示,来自海ly眼的复合动作电位(CAPs)的昼夜节律可以通过从连续的光照到连续的黑暗(LL / DD)的单一转换在体外重置。复位的大小取决于LL / DD之前的LL持续时间。当LL持续时间为18、21或24小时时,如果眼睛在神经上附着在大脑上,则重置的大小会与在神经上脱离时重置的大小不同。大脑产生终止于视网膜的视神经传出纤维。在本文中,我们通过询问已知存在于大脑或眼睛中的光感受器是否检测到LL / DD来探索视神经传出如何促进复位。将眼脑制剂放置在一个特殊的记录室中,在该记录室中,眼睛和大脑可以相互隔离,而一条视神经保持完整。然后,LL / DD在不同的时间传递到眼睛和大脑。在单独的照明过程中,可逆性神经阻滞阻止了眼睛和大脑之间的神经沟通。产生的复位幅度始终与传递到眼睛的LL持续时间相对应。大脑中的感光细胞不能有效地促进复位。同样,复位不受LL / DD之前开始并持续LL / DD后6小时以上的神经阻滞的干扰。这意味着有关LL / DD时序的信息在以重置形式表示之前已在眼睛中存储了6个小时以上。我们得出的结论是,视神经中的传出纤维不能指导眼睛注意复位的幅度。相反,它们激活或调节眼睛本身潜在的昼夜节律功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号