首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Pharmacy Technology : jPT : Official Publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians >Can Practical Nurses Identify Older Home Care Clients at Risk ofDrug-Related Problems–Geriatricians’ Appraisal of Their Risk Screenings: A PilotStudy
【2h】

Can Practical Nurses Identify Older Home Care Clients at Risk ofDrug-Related Problems–Geriatricians’ Appraisal of Their Risk Screenings: A PilotStudy

机译:实用护士能否确定有风险的老年家庭护理客户与毒品有关的问题-老年人对他们的风险筛查的评估:试点研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Home care (HC) clients are increasingly older, have many chronic diseases, and use multiple medicines and thus are at high risk for drug-related problems (DRPs). >Objective: Establish the sensitivity of practical nurse (PN) administered DRP risk assessment tool (DRP-RAT) compared with geriatrician’s assessment of the medical record. Identify the clinically most significant DRPs needing action. >Methods: Twenty-six PNs working in HC of Härkätie Health Center in Lieto, Finland, 46 HC clients (≥65 years), and a geriatrician participated in this pilot study. The geriatrician reviewed HC clients’ medications using 3 different methods. The reviews were based on the following: (1) the PN’s risk screening (ie, PN-completed DRP-RAT) and medication list, (2) health center’s medical records, and (3) methods 1 and 2 together. The main outcome was the number of “at-risk patients” (ie, the patient is at risk of clinically significant DRPs) by using each review method. Secondary outcomes were clinically most significant DRP-risk predicting factors identified by the geriatrician. >Results: The geriatrician reviewed 45 clients’ medications using all 3 methods. Based on PN-completed DRP-RAT and medication list, 93% (42/45) of the clients were classified as “at-riskpatients.” Two other review methods resulted in 45/45 (100%) “at-risk patients.”Symptoms suggestive of adverse drug reactions were the most significant riskpredicting factors. Small sample size limits the generalizability of theresults. >Conclusions: The PN-completed DRP-RAT was able to provideclinically important timely patient information for clinical decision making.DRP-RAT could make it possible to more effectively involve PNs in medicationrisk management among older HC clients.
机译:>背景:家庭护理(HC)客户的年龄越来越大,患有多种慢性疾病,并且使用多种药物,因此面临与药物相关的问题(DRP)的高风险。 >目标:建立由实际护士(PN)管理的DRP风险评估工具(DRP-RAT)与老人对病历评估的敏感性。确定临床上最重要的需要采取措施的DRP。 >方法:在芬兰列托Härkätie保健中心的HC工作的26位PN,46位HC客户(≥65岁)和一位老年医生参加了该试验研究。这位老年医师使用3种不同的方法审查了HC客户的药物。审查基于以下内容:(1)PN的风险筛查(即PN完成的DRP-RAT)和用药清单,(2)卫生中心的病历,以及(3)方法1和2一起。主要结果是通过使用每种检查方法得出的“高危患者”人数(即该患者处于临床上有意义的DRP风险中)。次要结果是由老年科医生确定的临床上最重要的DRP风险预测因素。 >结果:这位老年医师使用全部3种方法检查了45种客户的药物。根据完成PN的DRP-RAT和用药清单,将93%(42/45)的客户归类为“有风险”耐心。”另两种审查方法导致45/45(100%)“高危患者”。提示药物不良反应的症状是最大的风险预测因素。小样本量限制了样本的通用性结果。 >结论:完成PN的DRP-RAT能够提供具有临床重要性的及时患者信息,以进行临床决策。DRP-RAT可以使PNs更有效地参与药物治疗老年HC客户之间的风险管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号