首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Physical Therapy Science >Relationship between frontal assessment battery scores and activities ofdaily living/instrumental activities of daily living ability in olderadults
【2h】

Relationship between frontal assessment battery scores and activities ofdaily living/instrumental activities of daily living ability in olderadults

机译:额度评估电池分数与儿童活动之间的关系老年人的日常生活/工具活动大人

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

[Purpose] The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between Frontal Assessment Battery scores and the ability to perform activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living based on child development, as well as the ability of Frontal Assessment Battery score to predict functional age. [Participants and Methods] The present cross-sectional study included 85 older adults (mean age: 83.5 years, standard deviation: 7.3; men: 23, women: 62; facility-dwelling: 43, home-based: 42) recruited from nursing homes and day centers in Hiroshima and Hyogo, Japan. All the participants were assessed using the Frontal Assessment Battery and perform activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living Cognitive Level Version 2.0 scale (ADL/IADL-COG ver.2.0). Spearman rank correlation coefficients and single regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between the Frontal Assessment Battery score and functional age. The regression equation was then used to predict functional age based on the Frontal Assessment Battery score. [Results] We observed a strong correlation between the Frontal Assessment Battery score and functional age (rs=0.80). Furthermore, the linear regression equation for functional age exhibited a high predictive accuracy (R2=0.64). Our results thus indicated that Frontal Assessment Battery scores could be used to predict functional age according to thefollowing equation: functional age (years)=0.56 × Frontal Assessment Battery score + 1.19and Frontal Assessment Battery score=1.15 × functional age (years) + 1.86. [Conclusion]The present results indicate a significant relationship between Frontal Assessment Batteryand perform activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living abilitybased on child development. Functional age, as predicted based on the Frontal AssessmentBattery score, may aid rehabilitation practitioners in analyzing the relationship betweencognitive function and perform activities of daily living/instrumental activities of dailyliving ability, setting goals regarding perform activities of daily living/instrumentalactivities of daily living, and selecting intervention targets in older adults.
机译:[目的]本研究旨在探讨额度评估电池得分与基于儿童发育的日常生活活动/工具活动能力之间的关系,以及额度评估电池得分预测功能年龄的能力。 [参与者和方法]本项横断面研究包括了从护理中招募的85名老年人(平均年龄:83.5岁,标准差:7.3;男性:23,女性:62;设施居住:43,家庭住所:42)。日本广岛和兵库市的日托中心和日托。使用正面评估电池对所有参与者进行评估,并进行日常生活活动/日常生活的工具活动(认知水平2.0量表)(ADL / IADL-COG ver.2.0)。使用Spearman等级相关系数和单次回归分析来确定额度评估电池得分与功能年龄之间的关系。然后,使用回归方程根据额度评估电池得分来预测功能年龄。 [结果]我们观察到额叶评估电池评分与功能年龄之间有很强的相关性(rs = 0.80)。此外,针对功能年龄的线性回归方程具有较高的预测准确性(R 2 = 0.64)。因此,我们的结果表明,额度评估电池得分可用于根据以下等式:功能年龄(年)= 0.56×正面评估电池得分+1.19和额度评估电池分数= 1.15×功能年龄(年)+ 1.86。 [结论]目前的结果表明,正面评估电池之间存在显着关系并进行日常生活活动/日常生活能力的工具活动以儿童成长为基础。根据年龄评估预测的功能年龄电池得分,可以帮助康复从业者分析两者之间的关系认知功能和日常生活活动/日常工具活动生活能力,设定有关执行日常生活/工具活动的目标的日常活动,并选择老年人的干预目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号