首页> 外文期刊>Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology >Assessment of instrumental activities of daily living in dementia: Diagnostic value of the amsterdam instrumental activities of daily living questionnaire
【24h】

Assessment of instrumental activities of daily living in dementia: Diagnostic value of the amsterdam instrumental activities of daily living questionnaire

机译:痴呆症患者日常工具活动的评估:阿姆斯特丹日常工具活动的诊断价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Measuring impairments in "instrumental activities of daily living" (IADL) is important in dementia, but challenging due to the lack of reliable and valid instruments. We recently developed the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (A-IADL-Q; note 1). We aim to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the A-IADL-Q for dementia in a memory clinic setting. Methods: Patients visiting the Alzheimer Center of the VU University Medical Center with their informants between 2009 and 2011 were included (N = 278). Diagnoses were established in a multidisciplinary consensus meeting, independent of the A-IADL-Q scores. An optimal A-IADL-Q cutoff point was determined, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Area under the curves (AUCs) were compared between A-IADL-Q and "disability assessment of dementia" (DAD). The additional diagnostic value of the A-IADL-Q to Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was examined using logistic regression analyses. Results: Dementia prevalence was 50.5%. Overall diagnostic accuracy based on the AUC was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.81) for the A-IADL-Q and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.63-0.77) for the DAD, which did not differ significantly. The optimal cutoff score for the A-IADL-Q was 51.4, resulting in sensitivity of 0.74 and specificity of 0.64. Combining the A-IADL-Q with the MMSE improved specificity (0.94), with a decline in sensitivity (0.55). Logistic regression models showed that adding A-IADL-Q improved the diagnostic accuracy (Z = 2.55, P = .011), whereas the DAD did not. Conclusions: In this study, we showed a fair diagnostic accuracy for A-IADL-Q and an additional value in the diagnosis of dementia. These results support the role of A-IADLQ as a valuable diagnostic tool.
机译:背景:在“痴呆症”中测量“日常生活中的工具活动”(IADL)的损伤很重要,但由于缺乏可靠且有效的仪器而具有挑战性。最近,我们开发了阿姆斯特丹日常问卷调查工具活动(A-IADL-Q;注释1)。我们旨在调查A-IADL-Q在记忆诊所中对痴呆症的诊断准确性。方法:纳入2009年至2011年间访问VU大学医学中心阿兹海默中心及其线人的患者(N = 278)。诊断是在多学科共识会议上进行的,与A-IADL-Q得分无关。确定最佳的A-IADL-Q截止点,并计算灵敏度和特异性。比较了A-IADL-Q和“痴呆症残疾评估”(DAD)之间的曲线下面积(AUC)。使用Logistic回归分析检查了A-IADL-Q对小精神状态检查(MMSE)的附加诊断价值。结果:痴呆患病率为50.5%。对于A-IADL-Q,基于AUC的总体诊断准确度为0.75(95%置信区间[CI]:0.70-0.81),对于DAD,基于AUC的总体诊断准确度为0.70(95%CI:0.63-0.77),差异无显着性。 A-IADL-Q的最佳截止分值为51.4,因此敏感性为0.74,特异性为0.64。将A-IADL-Q与MMSE结合使用可提高特异性(0.94),并降低灵敏度(0.55)。 Logistic回归模型显示,添加A-IADL-Q可以提高诊断准确性(Z = 2.55,P = .011),而DAD却不能。结论:在这项研究中,我们显示了A-IADL-Q的合理诊断准确性,并在痴呆的诊断中具有附加价值。这些结果支持A-IADLQ作为有价值的诊断工具的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号