首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Physical Therapy Science >Kinematic analysis of the lower cervical spine in the protracted andretracted neck flexion positions
【2h】

Kinematic analysis of the lower cervical spine in the protracted andretracted neck flexion positions

机译:长期颈椎下颈椎的运动学分析。缩回颈屈位

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to analyze lower cervical spine kinematics in protracted and retracted neck flexion positions in healthy people. [Subjects and Methods] The craniovertebral angle (CVA) and intervertebral body angles of the lower cervical spine of 10 healthy individuals were analyzed using fluoroscopy in a neutral sitting with the head in the neutral (N), protracted (Pro), and retracted (Ret) positions and with the neck in full flexion with the head in the neutral (N-fx), protracted (Pro-fx), and retracted (Ret-fx) positions. [Results] There were significant differences in the CVA and intervertebral body angle at the C3–4 level, and the Ret position showed the highest values followed by the N and Pro positions. Regarding the intervertebral body angle at the C4–5 level, the Pro position showed a higher value than the N and Ret positions. At the C6–7 level, the Pro position showed the lowest value compared with the N and Ret positions. In the CVA, the Ret-fx position showed a higher value than the N-fx and Ret-fx positions. [Conclusion] The results suggest that in the neutral sitting position, protraction is an ineffective posture due to overstress of the C6–7 segment, which is placed in a hyperflexed position at this level. Instead, retraction is the recommend posture for the patient with C6–7 degeneration, which makes for a more flexed position in the upper cervical spine and a less flexed position in the lower cervical spine.
机译:[目的]本研究的目的是分析健康人长期和缩回颈屈位时的下颈椎运动学。 [对象和方法]使用荧光检查法在中性坐位(头部处于中性(N),伸出(Pro)和缩回(10))的情况下,使用荧光检查法分析了10名健康个体的下颈椎的颅椎角(CVA)和椎体角。 Ret)位置,并且颈部完全屈曲,头部处于中立(N-fx),伸出(Pro-fx)和缩回(Ret-fx)位置。 [结果]在C3–4水平,CVA和椎体角度存在显着差异,Ret位置显示最高值,其次是N和Pro位置。关于C4–5水平的椎体角度,Pro位置显示出比N和Ret位置更高的值。在C6-7级别,Pro位置与N和Ret位置相比显示最低值。在CVA中,Ret-fx位置显示出比N-fx和Ret-fx位置更高的值。 [结论]结果表明,在中性坐姿下,由于C6-7节的过大应力而导致的伸直是无效的姿势,C6-7节在该位置处于过度弯曲的姿势。取而代之的是,对于C6–7变性的患者,建议采用缩回姿势,这会使上颈椎的位置更加弯曲,而下颈椎的位置则较少弯曲。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号