首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Health Services Research >Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation - individual versus group (HEARING) trial: RCT design and baseline characteristics
【2h】

Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation - individual versus group (HEARING) trial: RCT design and baseline characteristics

机译:听觉康复后的助听器效果-个人与小组(HEARING)试验:RCT设计和基线特征

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundHearing impairment is the most common body system disability in veterans. In 2008, nearly 520,000 veterans had a disability for hearing loss through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Changes in eligibility for hearing aid services, along with the aging population, contributed to a greater than 300% increase in the number of hearing aids dispensed from 1996 to 2006. In 2006, the VA committed to having no wait times for patient visits while providing quality clinically-appropriate care. One approach to achieving this goal is the use of group visits as an alternative to individual visits. We sought to determine: 1) if group hearing aid fitting and follow-up visits were at least as effective as individual visits, and 2) whether group visits lead to cost savings through the six month period after the hearing aid fitting. We describe the rationale, design, and characteristics of the baseline cohort of the first randomized clinical trial to study the impact of group versus individual hearing aid fitting and follow-up visits.
机译:背景听力障碍是退伍军人中最常见的身体系统残疾。 2008年,将近520,000名退伍军人因退伍军人事务部(VA)失聪。从1996年到2006年,助听器服务资格的变化以及人口的老龄化导致配发助听器的数量增加了300%以上。2006年,弗吉尼亚州致力于在提供服务的同时不等待患者就诊的时间。高质量的临床适当护理。实现此目标的一种方法是使用小组访问来代替个人访问。我们试图确定:1)进行小组助听器验配和随访至少与个人访视一样有效,以及2)在进行助听器验配后的六个月内,小组访视是否能节省成本。我们描述了第一个随机临床试验的基线队列的基本原理,设计和特征,以研究组与个人助听器配合和随访的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号