首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Physical Therapy Science >Comparison of the effectiveness of local corticosteroid injection andextracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis
【2h】

Comparison of the effectiveness of local corticosteroid injection andextracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis

机译:局部注射皮质类固醇和外侧上con炎患者体外冲击波治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

[Purpose] This study aimed to determine and compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and local corticosteroid injection in patients with lateral epicondylitis. [Subjects and Methods] Sixty-four patients with lateral epicondylitis were randomly divided into extracorporeal shock wave therapy and steroid injection groups. Patients were evaluated using hand grip strength, visual analog scale, and short-form McGill pain questionnaire at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment. [Results] Both groups showed statistically significant increase in hand grip strength and decreases on the visual analog scale and short form McGill pain questionnaire overtime. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of improvement in hand grip strength and on the short-form McGill pain questionnaire between groups at 4 weeks post-treatment, whereas the extracorporeal shock wave therapy group showed better results on the visual analog scale. The percentages of improvements in all 3 parameters were higher in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy group than in the injection group at 12 weeks post-treatment. [Conclusion] Both the extracorporeal shock wave therapy and steroid injection were safe and effective in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. However, extracorporeal shock wave therapy demonstrated better outcomes than steroid injection at the long-term follow-up.
机译:[目的]本研究旨在确定和比较体外冲击波疗法和局部皮质类固醇激素注射治疗外侧epi上炎的有效性。 [对象与方法]将64例外侧上epi炎患者随机分为体外冲击波治疗组和类固醇注射组。在基线时以及治疗后4周和12周使用手握强度,视觉模拟量表和简短的McGill疼痛问卷对患者进行评估。 [结果]两组患者的握力强度均有统计学意义的增加,而视觉模拟量表和简短的McGill疼痛问卷随时间的推移呈下降趋势。治疗后4周,各组之间的握力改善率和简短的McGill疼痛问卷的改善百分率之间在统计学上无显着差异,而体外冲击波治疗组在视觉模拟量表上显示出更好的结果。在治疗后12周,体外冲击波治疗组所有3个参数的改善百分比均高于注射组。结论体外冲击波治疗和类固醇激素注射治疗外阴上con炎均安全,有效。然而,在长期随访中,体外冲击波疗法显示出比类固醇注射更好的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号