首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews

【2h】

Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews

机译：系统评价的灰色文献：非英语报告未发表的研究和论文对与儿童相关的评价的荟萃分析结果的横断面研究

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

BackgroundSystematic reviews (SRs) are an important source of information about healthcare interventions. A key component of a well-conducted SR is a comprehensive literature search. There is limited evidence on the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies, and dissertations and their impact on results of meta-analyses.

机译：背景系统评价（SR）是有关医疗保健干预措施的重要信息来源。进行良好SR的关键是全面的文献搜索。关于非英语报告，未发表的研究和论文的贡献及其对荟萃分析结果的影响的证据有限。

著录项

期刊名称 BMC Medical Research Methodology
作者
Lisa Hartling; Robin Featherstone; Megan Nuspl; Kassi Shave; Donna M. Dryden; Ben Vandermeer;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2017(17),-1
年度 2017
页码 64
总页数 11
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类医院、综合医院;中医院;
关键词
Systematic reviews Literature searching Meta-analysis Knowledge synthesis Publication bias Language bias Grey literature Unpublished studies Dissertations Non-English publications;

机译：系统评价;文献检索;元分析;知识综合;出版偏见;语言偏见;灰色文学;未发表的研究;论文;非英语出版物;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews [J] . Lisa Hartling, Robin Featherstone, Megan Nuspl, BMC Medical Research Methodology . 2017,第1期

机译：系统评价中的灰色文献：非英语报告，未发表的研究和论文对与儿童相关的评价的荟萃分析结果的横断面研究
2. A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses [J] . Christine Schmucker, Annette Bluemle, Matthias Briel, Systematic Reviews . 2013,第1期

机译：对未发表的研究和灰色文献中发表的研究的影响进行系统评价的方案
3. Methodology and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in psychiatric epidemiology: systematic review [J] . David R. Jones, Jordi Alonso, Ruth Matthews, The British journal of psychiatry : . 2012,第6期

机译：精神病流行病学的系统评价和观察性研究的系统评价及荟萃分析的方法和报告：系统评价
4. Using the 5W+1H Model in Reporting Systematic Literature Review: A Case Study on Software Testing for Cloud Computing [C] . Jia Changjiang, Yu Yuen Tak International Conference on Quality Software . 2013

机译：在报告系统文献回顾中使用5W + 1H模型：以云计算软件测试为例
5. Reporting the Performance of Confidence Intervals in Statistical Simulation Studies: A Systematic Literature Review [D] . Kabakci, Maside. 2019

机译：报告统计模拟研究中置信区间的置信区间性能：系统文献综述
6. Finding studies for inclusion in systematic reviews of interventions for injury prevention – the importance of grey and unpublished literature [O] . K Blackhall, K Ker 2007

机译：寻找可纳入预防伤害干预措施系统评价的研究-灰色文献和未发表文献的重要性
7. Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews [O] . Lisa Hartling, Robin Featherstone, Megan Nuspl, 2017

机译：系统评价中的灰色文献：非英语报告，未发表的研究和论文对儿童相关评论中荟萃分析结果的贡献的横断面研究

Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅