首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Public Health >Does cost sharing do more harm or more good? - a systematic literature review
【2h】

Does cost sharing do more harm or more good? - a systematic literature review

机译:成本分担会带来更大的危害还是更好? -系统的文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThere are positive and negative consequences of the implementation of out of pocket (OOP) payments as a source of the healthcare financing. On the one hand, OOP burden increases awareness of treatment costs and limits unnecessary use of healthcare services. On the other hand, it may prevent the sick from accessing needed care. Consequently there are several aspects that ought to be taken into consideration while defining the optimal structure of OOP payments. The objective of this study was twofold. Firstly, it was to understand what actions are taken to decrease the OOP burden. Secondly, it was to address the question whether the implementation of any form of formal OOP payments may impact negatively upon fairness in financial contribution.
机译:背景技术实施自付费用(OOP)作为医疗保健筹资的来源有正面和负面的影响。一方面,OOP负担增加了人们对治疗成本的认识,并限制了医疗服务的不必要使用。另一方面,它可能阻止病人获得所需的护理。因此,在定义OOP付款的最佳结构时应考虑多个方面。这项研究的目的是双重的。首先,要了解采取了哪些措施来减少OOP负担。第二,要解决的问题是,执行任何形式的正式自用付款方式是否可能对财政捐款的公平性产生负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号