首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Pulmonary Medicine >Are there differences among operators in false-negative rates of endosonography with needle aspiration for mediastinal nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer?
【2h】

Are there differences among operators in false-negative rates of endosonography with needle aspiration for mediastinal nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer?

机译:非小细胞肺癌纵隔淋巴结分期的内镜检查误诊率与针穿刺术率是否存在差异?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundEndosonography with needle aspiration (EBUS/EUS-NA) is recommended as the first choice for mediastinal nodal assessment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is important to maintain adequate negative predictive value of the procedure to avoid unnecessary additional surgical staging, but there are few studies on the influence of operator-related factors including competency on false negative results. This study aims to compare the false negative rate of individual operators and whether it changes according to accumulation of experience.
机译:背景技术推荐将带针吸的超声内镜检查(EBUS / EUS-NA)作为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)纵隔淋巴结评估的首选。重要的是要保持适当的阴性预测值,以避免不必要的额外手术分期,但是关于操作员相关因素(包括能力)对假阴性结果的影响的研究很少。本研究旨在比较单个操作员的假阴性率以及它是否根据经验积累而变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号