首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Surgery >The efficacy of Radio guided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL) versus Wire-guided Localization (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial – ROLL study
【2h】

The efficacy of Radio guided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL) versus Wire-guided Localization (WGL) in breast conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial – ROLL study

机译:放射导向的隐匿性病变定位(ROLL)与导线导向的定位(WGL)在不可触及的乳腺癌保乳手术中的功效:一项随机临床试验– ROLL研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundWith the increasing number of non palpable breast carcinomas, the need of a good and reliable localization method increases. Currently the wire guided localization (WGL) is the standard of care in most countries. Radio guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) is a new technique that may improve the oncological outcome, cost effectiveness, patient comfort and cosmetic outcome. However, the studies published hitherto are of poor quality providing less than convincing evidence to change the current standard of care.The aim of this study is to compare the ROLL technique with the standard of care (WGL) regarding the percentage of tumour free margins, cost effectiveness, patient comfort and cosmetic outcome.
机译:背景技术随着不可触及的乳腺癌数量的增加,对一种良好而可靠的定位方法的需求也在增加。当前,在大多数国家/地区,线引导本地化(WGL)是护理的标准。无线电隐匿病变定位(ROLL)是一种新技术,可以改善肿瘤学结果,成本效益,患者舒适度和美容效果。然而,迄今发表的研究质量较差,不足以提供令人信服的证据来改变当前的护理标准。本研究的目的是将ROLL技术与护理标准(WGL)的无肿瘤切缘百分比进行比较,成本效益,患者舒适度和美容效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号