首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Surgery >Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND-study)
【2h】

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND-study)

机译:经肛门内窥镜显微手术与内镜黏膜切除术治疗大直肠腺瘤(TREND研究)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundRecent non-randomized studies suggest that extended endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is equally effective in removing large rectal adenomas as transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). If equally effective, EMR might be a more cost-effective approach as this strategy does not require expensive equipment, general anesthesia and hospital admission. Furthermore, EMR appears to be associated with fewer complications.The aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of TEM and EMR for the resection of large rectal adenomas.
机译:背景技术最近的非随机研究表明,扩大内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)与经肛门内镜显微外科手术(TEM)一样,在去除大直肠腺瘤方面同样有效。如果同样有效,EMR可能是一种更具成本效益的方法,因为该策略不需要昂贵的设备,全身麻醉和住院治疗。此外,EMR似乎与并发症较少相关。本研究的目的是比较TEM和EMR切除大直肠腺瘤的成本效益和成本效益。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号