首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Physiology >Differential blood flow responses to CO2 in human internal and external carotid and vertebral arteries
【2h】

Differential blood flow responses to CO2 in human internal and external carotid and vertebral arteries

机译:人的内外颈动脉和椎动脉对CO2的不同血流反应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Arterial CO2 serves as a mediator of cerebral blood flow (CBF), and its relative influence on the regulation of CBF is defined as cerebral CO2 reactivity. Our previous studies have demonstrated that there are differences in CBF responses to physiological stimuli (i.e. dynamic exercise and orthostatic stress) between arteries in humans. These findings suggest that dynamic CBF regulation and cerebral CO2 reactivity may be different in the anterior and posterior cerebral circulation. The aim of this study was to identify cerebral CO2 reactivity by measuring blood flow and examine potential differences in CO2 reactivity between the internal carotid artery (ICA), external carotid artery (ECA) and vertebral artery (VA). In 10 healthy young subjects, we evaluated the ICA, ECA, and VA blood flow responses by duplex ultrasonography (Vivid-e, GE Healthcare), and mean blood flow velocity in middle cerebral artery (MCA) and basilar artery (BA) by transcranial Doppler (Vivid-7, GE healthcare) during two levels of hypercapnia (3% and 6% CO2), normocapnia and hypocapnia to estimate CO2 reactivity. To characterize cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2, we used both exponential and linear regression analysis between CBF and estimated partial pressure of arterial CO2, calculated by end-tidal partial pressure of CO2. CO2 reactivity in VA was significantly lower than in ICA (coefficient of exponential regression 0.021 ± 0.008 vs. 0.030 ± 0.008; slope of linear regression 2.11 ± 0.84 vs. 3.18 ± 1.09% mmHg−1: VA vs. ICA, P < 0.01). Lower CO2 reactivity in the posterior cerebral circulation was persistent in distal intracranial arteries (exponent 0.023 ± 0.006 vs. 0.037 ± 0.009; linear 2.29 ± 0.56 vs. 3.31 ± 0.87% mmHg−1: BA vs. MCA). In contrast, CO2 reactivity in ECA was markedly lower than in the intra-cerebral circulation (exponent 0.006 ± 0.007; linear 0.63 ± 0.64% mmHg−1, P < 0.01). These findings indicate that vertebro-basilar circulation has lower CO2 reactivity than internal carotid circulation, and that CO2 reactivity of the external carotid circulation is markedly diminished compared to that of the cerebral circulation, which may explain different CBF responses to physiological stress.
机译:动脉CO2充当脑血流量(CBF)的介质,其对CBF调节的相对影响定义为脑CO2反应性。我们以前的研究表明,人的动脉之间的CBF对生理刺激(即动态运动和体位压力)的反应存在差异。这些发现表明动态CBF调节和大脑CO2反应性可能在大脑的前后循环中有所不同。这项研究的目的是通过测量血流来确定大脑的CO2反应性,并检查颈内动脉(ICA),颈外动脉(ECA)和椎动脉(VA)之间的CO2反应性潜在差异。在10名健康的年轻受试者中,我们通过双工超声检查(Vivid-e,GE Healthcare)评估了ICA,ECA和VA血流反应,并通过经颅颅评估了大脑中动脉(MCA)和基底动脉(BA)的平均血流速度多普勒(Vivid-7,GE Healthcare)在高碳酸血症(3%和6%CO2),正常碳酸血症和低碳酸血症两个水平期间估计二氧化碳的反应性。为了表征脑血管对CO2的反应性,我们使用了CBF和通过潮气末CO2分压估算的动脉CO2分压之间的指数和线性回归分析。 VA中的CO2反应性显着低于ICA(指数回归系数0.021±0.008 vs.0.030±0.008;线性回归斜率2.11±0.84 vs.3.18±1.09%mmHg -1 :VA vs ICA,P <0.01)。颅后动脉在大脑后循环中的CO2反应性较低(指数0.023±0.006 vs.0.037±0.009;线性2.29±0.56 vs.3.31±0.87%mmHg −1 :BA vs.MCA )。相反,ECA中的CO2反应性显着低于脑内循环(指数0.006±0.007;线性0.63±0.64%mmHg -1 ,P <0.01)。这些发现表明椎基底循环比内颈动脉循环具有较低的CO 2反应性,并且与脑循环相比,颈外循环的CO 2反应性明显降低,这可以解释不同的CBF对生理压力的反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号