首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Global Health >40 years after Alma-Ata is building new hospitals in low-income and lower-middle-income countries beneficial?
【2h】

40 years after Alma-Ata is building new hospitals in low-income and lower-middle-income countries beneficial?

机译:在阿拉木图成立40年之后在低收入和中低收入国家/地区建立新医院是否有益?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Public hospitals in low-income and lower-middle-income countries face acute material and financial constraints, and there is a trend towards building new hospitals to contend with growing population health needs. Three cases of new hospital construction are used to explore issues in relation to their funding, maintenance and sustainability. While hospitals are recognised as a key component of healthcare systems, their role, organisation, funding and other aspects have been largely neglected in health policies and debates since the Alma Ata Declaration. Building new hospitals is politically more attractive for both national decision-makers and donors because they symbolise progress, better services and nation-building. To avoid the ‘white elephant’ syndrome, the deepening of within-country socioeconomic and geographical inequalities (especially urban–rural), and the exacerbation of hospital-centrism, there is an urgent need to investigate in greater depth how these hospitals are integrated into health systems and to discuss their long-term economic, social and environmental sustainability.
机译:低收入和中低收入国家的公立医院面临着严重的物质和财政限制,并且有一种趋势是建立新的医院来应对不断增长的人口健康需求。在新医院建设的三个案例中,研究了有关其资金,维护和可持续性的问题。尽管人们公认医院是医疗保健系统的关键组成部分,但是自《阿拉木图宣言》以来,医院的作用,组织,资金和其他方面在卫生政策和辩论中已被很大程度上忽略。在政治上,建设新医院对国家决策者和捐助者都更具吸引力,因为它们象征着进步,更好的服务和国家建设。为了避免“白象”综合症,国内社会经济和地理不平等现象的加剧(尤其是城乡差距)以及医院中心主义的加剧,迫切需要更深入地研究这些医院如何融入卫生系统并讨论其长期的经济,社会和环境可持续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号