首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Physiology >Scale exponents of blood pressure and heart rate during autonomic blockade as assessed by detrended fluctuation analysis
【2h】

Scale exponents of blood pressure and heart rate during autonomic blockade as assessed by detrended fluctuation analysis

机译:通过去趋势波动分析评估的自主神经阻滞过程中血压和心率的比例指数

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

How the autonomic nervous system influences the fractal dynamics of heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) remains unclear. The purpose of our study was to separately assess cardiac vagal and sympathetic (cardiac vs. vascular) influences on fractal properties of HR and BP as described by scale exponents of detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). R–R intervals, systolic and diastolic BP were measured in nine supine volunteers before and after administration of autonomic blocking agents (atropine, propranolol, atropine + propranolol, clonidine). Spectra of DFA scale exponents, α(t), were calculated for scales between 5 and 100 s. HR and BP scale structures differed at baseline, being α(t) of HR <1, with a minimum between 10 and 20 s followed by a higher plateau between 40 to 80 s, while α(t) of BP decreased with t from values >1. Comparison of atropine and propranolol with baseline and combined cardiac parasympathetic and sympathetic blockade (atropine + propranolol) indicated opposite influences of vagal and cardiac sympathetic outflows on HR exponents. The vagal outflow adds white-noise components, amplifying differences with BP exponents; the cardiac sympathetic outflow adds Brownian motion components at short scales and contributes to the plateau between 40 and 80 s. Overall sympathetic inhibition by clonidine decreased short- and long-term exponents of HR, and short-term exponents of BP, so that their α(t) spectra had different means but similar profiles. Therefore, cardiac vagal, cardiac sympathetic and vascular sympathetic outflows contribute differently to HR and BP fractal structures. Results are explained by different distribution and dynamics of acetylcholine receptors and of α- and β-adrenergic receptors between heart and vasculature.
机译:自主神经系统如何影响心率(HR)和血压(BP)的分形动力学仍不清楚。我们研究的目的是按照去趋势波动分析(DFA)的规模指数来分别评估心脏迷走神经和交感神经(心脏与血管)对HR和BP分形特性的影响。在服用自主神经阻滞剂(阿托品,普萘洛尔,阿托品+普萘洛尔,可乐定)前后,对9名仰卧志愿者测量了R-R间隔,收缩压和舒张压。计算了5到100 s范围内的DFA比例指数α(t)的光谱。 HR和BP量表的结构在基线时有所不同,即HR <1,最小为10到20 s,随后在40到80 s内出现更高的平稳期,而BP的α(t)随着t从值降低> 1。将阿托品和普萘洛尔与基线以及心脏副交感神经和交感神经阻滞(阿托品+普萘洛尔)的比较表明,迷走神经和心脏交感神经外流对心率指数具有相反的影响。迷走神经外流增加了白噪声成分,从而放大了与BP指数之间的差异。心脏交感神经外流会在短时间内增加布朗运动分量,并在40到80 s内导致平稳期。可乐定对总交感神经的抑制作用会降低HR的短期和长期指数,以及BP的短期指数,因此它们的α(t)谱图具有不同的均值但具有相似的特征。因此,心脏迷走神经,心脏交感神经和血管交感神经流出对HR和BP分形结构的贡献不同。结果通过心脏和脉管系统之间乙酰胆碱受体以及α-和β-肾上腺素能受体的不同分布和动力学来解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号