首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Exploring standardisation monitoring and training of medical devices in assisted vaginal birth studies: protocol for a systematic review
【2h】

Exploring standardisation monitoring and training of medical devices in assisted vaginal birth studies: protocol for a systematic review

机译:在辅助阴道分娩研究中探索医疗设备的标准化监视和培训:系统评价的方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionAssisted vaginal birth (AVB) can markedly improve maternal and neonatal outcomes arising from complications in the second stage of labour. Historically, both forceps and ventouse devices have been used to assist birth; however, they are not without risk and are associated with complications, such as cephalohaematoma, retinal haemorrhage and perineal trauma. As new devices are developed to overcome the limitations of existing techniques, it is necessary to establish their efficacy and effectiveness within randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A major challenge of evaluating complex interventions (ie, invasive procedures/devices used to assist vaginal birth) is ensuring they are delivered as intended. It can be difficult to standardise intervention delivery and monitor fidelity, and account for the varying expertise of clinicians (accoucher expertise). This paper describes the protocol for a systematic review aiming to investigate the reporting of device standardisation, monitoring and training in trials evaluating complex interventions, using AVB as a case study.
机译:引言辅助阴道分娩(AVB)可以显着改善因第二产程并发症而引起的母亲和新生儿结局。从历史上看,镊子和排气装置都被用来辅助生育。然而,它们并非没有风险,并伴有并发症,例如头皮血肿,视网膜出血和会阴部创伤。随着新设备的开发克服了现有技术的局限性,有必要在随机对照试验(RCT)中确定其有效性和有效性。评估复杂干预措施(例如,用于协助阴道分娩的侵入性程序/设备)的主要挑战是确保按预期方式交付。可能难以对干预措施进行标准化并监测保真度,并难以说明临床医生的不同专长(凭单专长)。本文介绍了系统评估的协议,旨在以AVB为案例研究评估设备评估,干预和评估复杂干预措施的试验中的培训报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号