首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION
【2h】

36: COMPARISON OF SIDE EFFECTS IN TWO METHODS OF ENDOTRACHEAL SUCTIONING (OPEN AND CLOSED) IN PREMATURE INFANTS UNDER MECHANICAL VENTILATION

机译:图36:机械通气的早产儿两种气管内抽吸(开式和闭式)方法的副作用比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and aimsEndo tracheal suctioning is a common neonatal intensive care procedure that is performed to clear trachea bronchial airways of secretions and maintain patency of the endotracheal tube in intubated infants, which may lead to complications. Two systems are available to perform ES: open suction system and closed suction system. Since bacterial airway colonization, nosocomial pneumonia, and septicemia are important issues in neonatal care, recent study aims to compare side effects in two methods of endotracheal suctioning (open and closed) in premature infants under mechanical ventilation.
机译:背景与目的气管内吸是一种常见的新生儿重症监护程序,用于清除气管支气管气道的分泌物并保持插管婴儿的气管插管通畅,这可能导致并发症。有两种系统可以执行ES:开放式吸气系统和封闭式吸气系统。由于细菌气道定植,医院内肺炎和败血病是新生儿护理中的重要问题,因此最近的研究旨在比较机械通气对早产儿两种气管内抽吸方法(开放式和封闭式)的副作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号