首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial
【2h】

Curved versus Straight Stem Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Osteoarthritis Multicenter trial (CUSTOM): design of a prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial

机译:弯曲与直茎非骨水泥全髋关节置换术骨关节炎多中心试验(CUSTOM):前瞻性双盲随机对照多中心试验的设计

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionAnswering the demands of an increasingly young and active patient population, recent developments in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have shifted towards minimising tissue damage. The Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) stem was developed to preserve the trochanteric region of the femur, which potentially preserves the insertion of the gluteus musculature. This might accelerate early postoperative rehabilitation and improve functional outcome. Currently the functional results of the CFP stem have not been compared with conventional straight stems in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). The primary purpose of this trial is to compare the functional result of CFP stem THA with conventional uncemented straight stem THA, measured by the Dutch Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) at 3-month follow-up.
机译:简介为了满足日益年轻和活跃的患者群体的需求,全髋关节置换术(THA)的最新发展已朝着最大限度地减少组织损伤的方向发展。 Collum Femoris Preserving(CFP)茎被开发用于保护股骨的转子区,从而潜在地保留臀肌的插入。这可能会加快术后早期康复并改善功能结局。目前,在一项随机对照试验(RCT)中,尚未将CFP茎的功能结果与传统的直茎进行比较。该试验的主要目的是比较CFP茎THA与常规无骨水泥直茎THA的功能结果,该结果通过3个月的随访中的荷兰髋关节功能障碍和骨关节炎结果评分(HOOS)进行测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号