首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Differences in reporting serious adverse events in industry sponsored clinical trial registries and journal articles on antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs: a cross-sectional study

【2h】

Differences in reporting serious adverse events in industry sponsored clinical trial registries and journal articles on antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs: a cross-sectional study

机译：行业赞助的抗抑郁药和抗精神病药临床试验注册中心和期刊文章中报告严重不良事件的差异：一项横断面研究

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

ObjectiveTo examine the degree of concordance in reporting serious adverse events (SAEs) from antidepressant and antipsychotic drug trials among journal articles and clinical trial summaries, and to categorise types of discrepancies.

机译：目的探讨期刊论文和临床试验摘要中抗抑郁药和抗精神病药试验报告严重不良事件（SAE）的一致性程度，并对差异类型进行分类。

著录项

期刊名称 BMJ Open
作者
Shannon Hughes; David Cohen; Rachel Jaggi;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2014(4),7
年度 2014
页码 e005535
总页数 12
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY;

机译：临床药理学;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Differences in reporting serious adverse events in industry sponsored clinical trial registries and journal articles on antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs: a cross-sectional study [J] . David Cohen, Rachel Jaggi, Shannon Hughes BMJ Open . 2014,第7期

机译：行业资助的临床试验注册中心和抗抑郁药和抗精神病药期刊文章中报告严重不良事件的差异：一项横断面研究
2. Safety reporting in publications of industry-sponsored clinical trials: Evaluation of adherence to adverse events reporting recommendations [J] . Patil Sangita P., Patil Madhavi P., Shah Vatsal Current medical research and opinion . 2018,第Suppla1期

机译：行业赞助临床试验出版物的安全报告：对不良事件遵守的评估报告建议
3. Safety reporting in publications of industry-sponsored clinical trials: Evaluation of adherence to adverse events reporting recommendations [J] . Patil Sangita P., Patil Madhavi P., Shah Vatsal Current medical research and opinion . 2018,第Suppla1期

机译：行业赞助临床试验出版物的安全报告：对不良事件遵守的评估报告建议
4. ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING IN COMPANION ANIMAL CLINICAL TRIALS EVALUATING CANCER THERAPY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [C] . Michelle Giuffrida Conference of the American^College^of^Veterinary^Internal^Medicine . 2016

机译：伴侣动物临床试验评估癌症治疗的不良事件报告：系统审查
5. Hypersensitivity Adverse Event Reporting in Clinical Cancer Trials: Barriers and Potential Solutions to Studying Severe Events on a Population Level [D] . ?Eldredge, Christina 2020

机译：临床癌症试验中的超敏反不良事件报告：障碍和潜在的解决方案，用于研究人口水平的严重事件
6. Differences in Reporting of Analyses in Internal Company Documents Versus Published Trial Reports: Comparisons in Industry-Sponsored Trials in Off-Label Uses of Gabapentin [O] . S. Swaroop Vedula, Tianjing Li, Kay Dickersin 2013

机译：公司内部文件与已发布的试验报告相比分析报告的差异：加巴喷丁非处方用途的行业赞助试验比较
7. Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications [O] . B. Wieseler, M. F. Kerekes, V. Vervoelgyi, 2012

机译：文献类型对临床药物试验报告质量的影响：注册表报告，临床研究报告和期刊出版物的比较

Differences in reporting serious adverse events in industry sponsored clinical trial registries and journal articles on antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs: a cross-sectional study

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅