首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Physiology >Differences in sympathetic neuroeffector transmission to rat mesenteric arteries and veins as probed by in vitro continuous amperometry and video imaging
【2h】

Differences in sympathetic neuroeffector transmission to rat mesenteric arteries and veins as probed by in vitro continuous amperometry and video imaging

机译:体外连续安培法和视频成像探讨的交感神经效应传递到大鼠肠系膜动脉和静脉的差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As arteries are resistance blood vessels while veins perform a capacitance function, it might be expected that sympathetic neural control of arteries and veins would differ. The function of sympathetic nerves supplying mesenteric arteries (MA) and veins (MV) in rats was investigated using in vitro continuous amperometry with a carbon fibre microelectrode and video imaging. We simultaneously measured noradrenaline (NA) overflow at the blood vessel adventitial surface and vasoconstriction evoked by electrical stimulation of perivascular sympathetic nerves. Sympathetic nerve arrangement was studied using glyoxylic acid-induced fluorescence of NA. We found that: (i) there were significant differences between MA and MV in the arrangement of sympathetic nerves; (ii) frequency–response curves for NA overflow and vasoconstriction for MV were left-shifted compared to MA; (iii) the P2X receptor antagonist, pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2′,4′-disulphonic acid (PPADS, 10 μm), reduced constrictions in MA but not in MV while the α1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, prazosin (0.1 μm), blocked constrictions in MV but not in MA; (iv) NA overflow for MA was enhanced by the α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, yohimbine (1.0 μm), and attenuated by the α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, UK 14,304 (1.0 μm), while yohimbine and UK 14,304 had little effect in MV; (v) cocaine (10 μm) produced larger increases in NA overflow in MA than in MV; (vi) UK 14,304 constricted MV but not MA while yohimbine reduced constrictions in MV but not MA. We conclude that there are fundamental differences in sympathetic neuroeffector mechanisms in MA and MV, which are likely to contribute to their different haemodynamic functions.
机译:由于动脉是阻力血管,而静脉执行电容功能,因此可以预期,交感神经对动脉和静脉的控制会有所不同。使用具有碳纤维微电极的体外连续安培法和视频成像研究了大鼠中供应肠系膜动脉(MA)和静脉(MV)的交感神经的功能。我们同时测量了血管外膜表面的去甲肾上腺素(NA)溢出和通过电刺激血管周围交感神经引起的血管收缩。使用乙醛酸诱导的NA荧光研究交感神经的排列。我们发现:(i)交感神经的排列在MA和MV之间有显着差异; (ii)与MA相比,NA的NA溢出和血管收缩的频率-响应曲线向左移动; (iii)P2X受体拮抗剂吡pyr醛-磷酸-6-偶氮苯基-2',4'-二磺酸(PPADS,10μm)降低了MA的收缩,但MV没有降低,而α1-肾上腺素受体拮抗剂Prazosin(0.1 μm),在MV中阻塞了收缩,但在MA中没有阻塞; (iv)α2-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂育亨宾(1.0μm)增强了MA的NA溢出,而α2-肾上腺素能受体激动剂UK 14,304(1.0μm)减弱了NA的溢流,而育亨宾和UK 14,304对MV的作用很小。 ; (v)可卡因(10μm)在MA中产生的NA溢出量比在MV中产生的增加量大; (vi)UK 14,304收缩了MV,但未MA,而育亨宾降低了MV,但未降低MA。我们得出的结论是,MA和MV中的交感神经效应器机制存在根本差异,这可能有助于其不同的血液动力学功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号