首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Cancer >Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners and comparison with computer image analysis.
【2h】

Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners and comparison with computer image analysis.

机译:审查员之间和内部的痣计数的可比性以及与计算机图像分析的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the course of an investigation of melanocytic naevus development in Queensland, Australia, whole-body naevus counts of 66 adolescents were performed separately by two nurse examiners on two occasions on average 4 weeks apart. There was good agreement between the two examiners for counts of total naevi on the whole body (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.96) and at selected subsites (face, neck, back, upper arms, lower arms). Agreement was lower when raised naevi only were counted (0.83). Intra-examiner repeatability was high for both nurses, particularly for the more experienced examiner (intra-class correlation coefficients = 0.98 and 0.91 for total naevi on the whole body), and was consistently better when all naevi were counted rather than naevi of a particular size. Independent counts of naevi on the back using a computer imaging technique were reproducible (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.92), but showed only moderate agreement with counts by the nurse examiners. Overall, these results demonstrate high comparability of naevus counts between and within similarly trained examiners. They do not support the common practice in epidemiological studies of restricting counts to naevi larger than 2 mm, or of counting raised naevi only.
机译:在对澳大利亚昆士兰州的黑素细胞痣发育进行调查的过程中,两名护士检查员分别两次对66名青少年的全身痣计数进行了两次,平均间隔为4周。两位检查者在整个身体(类别内相关系数= 0.96)和选定的子部位(面部,颈部,背部,上臂,下臂)的总naevi计数方面有很好的一致性。仅计算提高的naevi时,同意率较低(0.83)。两位护士的考官内重复性都很高,特别是对于经验更丰富的考官而言(类内相关系数分别为整个体内的naevi的0.98和0.91),并且当计算所有naevi而不是某个特定的naevi时,一致性一直更好尺寸。使用计算机成像技术对naevi进行的独立计数可重现(类内相关系数= 0.92),但与护士检查员的计数仅显示中等程度的一致性。总体而言,这些结果表明,在经过类似培训的检查员之间和之内的痣计数具有高度可比性。他们不支持流行病学研究中将计数限制为大于2 mm的naevi或仅计数升高的naevi的通用做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号