首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of General Practice >General practitioners and occupational health services.
【2h】

General practitioners and occupational health services.

机译:全科医生和职业健康服务。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Occupational physicians and general practitioners often appear to differ in their attitudes to the provision of health screening, health promotion and vaccination in the workplace. AIM: This study aimed to explore the attitudes of occupational physicians and general practitioners to particular aspects of workplace health services. METHOD: Anonymous piloted postal questionnaires were sent to 400 UK general practitioners and 300 occupational physicians. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 260 general practitioners (65%) and 223 occupational physicians (74%). There are differences between the specialties in attitude to specific health screening and vaccination at work, and to the role of occupational health services in helping the disabled, but greater agreement on the usefulness of workplace health promotion. CONCLUSION: General practitioners may misunderstand the role, responsibilities and priorities of occupational health services. Further educational work needs to be done to overcome communication difficulties between the specialties.
机译:背景:职业医生和全科医生对工作场所提供健康检查,促进健康和接种疫苗的态度经常出现差异。目的:本研究旨在探讨职业医师和全科医生对工作场所卫生服务特定方面的态度。方法:将匿名的试点邮政调查表发送给400位英国全科医生和300位职业医生。结果:260名全科医生(65%)和223名职业医生(74%)返回了问卷。在对工作场所进行特定健康检查和接种疫苗的态度与职业健康服务在帮助残疾人方面的作用方面的专业之间存在差异,但在促进工作场所健康方面的作用达成了更大的共识。结论:全科医生可能会误解职业卫生服务的作用,职责和优先事项。有必要做进一步的教育工作,以克服各专业之间的交流困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号