首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of General Practice >Patients with suspected myocardial infarction: effect of mode of referral on admission time to a coronary care unit.
【2h】

Patients with suspected myocardial infarction: effect of mode of referral on admission time to a coronary care unit.

机译:疑似心肌梗死的患者:转诊方式对冠心病监护病房入院时间的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this prospective study was to determine the delay between the onset of symptoms and arrival in the coronary care unit of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, and the relative contribution to the total delay of patient delay, method of referral (self referral or general practitioner referral) and delay in the hospital before reaching the coronary care unit. All patients admitted with chest pain to the coronary care unit at Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham, over the six month period April-September 1989 were included in the study. Ninety five patients were referred by their general practitioner and 107 patients attended the accident and emergency department directly or arrived by ambulance without contacting their general practitioner. The proportion of self referred and general practitioner referred patients with acute myocardial infarction, angina and non-cardiac chest pain were not significantly different. The total delay was significantly longer for patients who had been referred by their general practitioner (median 5.3 hours) than for self referrals (3.2 hours, P less than 0.001), with a significantly higher proportion of self referrals arriving at the coronary care unit within six hours of the onset of symptoms (77% versus 54%, P less than 0.01). Among general practitioner referrals, initial patient delay accounted for a median of 2.5 hours and the general practitioner's response time for a median of 1.1 hours. The delay in hospital was similar for both groups of patients. In inner city areas, self referral may result in considerably less delay than general practitioner referral allowing a greater proportion of patients to receive effective thrombolytic therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
机译:这项前瞻性研究的目的是确定疑似急性心肌梗死患者的症状发作与到达冠心病护理单位之间的延迟,以及总延迟的总延迟的相对影响,转诊方法(自我转诊或全科医师转诊),并在到达冠心病监护室之前延迟住院。 1989年4月至9月的六个月内,所有在伯明翰达德利路医院的冠心病治疗科接受胸痛的患者均纳入研究。全科医生转诊了95名患者,有107名患者直接或直接通过急救车到达了急症室,没有联系全科医生。自转诊和全科医生转诊的急性心肌梗死,心绞痛和非心脏性胸痛患者的比例无显着差异。由全科医生转诊的患者(中位数5.3小时)的总延误明显长于自我转诊的患者(3.2小时,P小于0.001),并且自转诊到冠心病护理部门的比例显着更高症状发作六小时(77%比54%,P小于0.01)。在全科医生转诊中,初次患者延误的中位数为2.5小时,而全科医生的响应时间为中位数1.1小时。两组患者的住院延迟相似。在市区内,自我转诊比全科医生转诊所导致的延误要少得多,从而使更多的患者接受有效的溶栓治疗。(摘要截断为250个字)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号