首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Heart Journal >Direct admission to the coronary care unit by the ambulance service for patients with suspected myocardial infarction
【2h】

Direct admission to the coronary care unit by the ambulance service for patients with suspected myocardial infarction

机译:疑似心肌梗死的患者由救护车服务直接进入冠心病监护室

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background—Direct access to the coronary care unit (CCU) for general practitioner (GP) referred cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (fast track admission) substantially reduces the time to thrombolysis. Until now, this policy has been confined to GP referrals.
Objectives—To determine the time taken to admission to CCU under the fast track policy (ambulance referrals and GP referrals) and the time taken to start administration of thrombolytics (ambulance referrals, GP referrals, and accident and emergency referrals).
Methods—Fast track admission policy was extended to include referrals from ambulance personnel who respond to emergency service calls. Ambulance personnel referred cases were also examined to see if they were referred appropriately to the CCU.
Results—100 ambulance personnel referrals and 260 GP referrals to CCU with chest pain were studied. Forty accident and emergency referrals who had AMI requiring thrombolysis were also studied. In the ambulance referred group the time to admission from phone call was a median of 10 minutes (range 2 to 45), a saving of 30 minutes compared with GP referrals (median 40 minutes, range 2 to 217). The median diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) to thrombolysis time was longer in the accident and emergency referrals with AMI than either ambulance referrals or GP referrals admitted under the fast track policy. Diagnostic ECG to thrombolysis time: accident and emergency 50 minutes (range 15 to 385); ambulance referrals median 33 minutes (range 6 to 69); GP referrals median 29.5 minutes (range 5 to 110 minutes); (p = 0.056 accident and emergency compared with ambulance referrals, p < 0.002 accident and emergency compared with GP referrals). Of 100 ambulance referrals 52 patients exhibited symptoms suggestive of ischaemic heart disease (confirmed AMI, unstable angina, and angina) and a further 18 patients were required to stay in CCU for other cardiac problems. Thus a total of 70 (70%) were considered appropriate compared with 155 of 260 (55.8%) GP referred cases.
Conclusions—Extending the fast track admission policy to ambulance personnel reduces delay to admission for patients with suspected MI without adversely affecting the appropriateness of admissions.

Keywords: direct admission to coronary care;  time to thrombolysis;  ambulance personnel
机译:背景-由全科医生(GP)转诊的可疑急性心肌梗塞(AMI)(快速通道入院)病例可直接进入冠状动脉护理单元(CCU),大大减少了溶栓时间。到目前为止,该政策仅限于GP转诊。
目标-确定在快速通道政策下(急救车转诊和GP转诊)进入CCU所需的时间以及开始施用溶栓剂(救护车)的时间转诊,全科医生转诊以及事故和紧急情况转诊。)
方法-快速通道入场政策已扩展到包括响应急救电话的救护人员的转诊。结果-还研究了100例救护人员转诊和260例因胸痛转诊到CCU的转诊病例。还研究了40例AMI需要溶栓的急诊和急诊转诊。在转诊的救护车组中,从电话接收到的时间中位数为10分钟(范围2到45),与GP转诊(中位数40分钟,范围2到217)相比节省了30分钟。在发生AMI的事故和紧急转诊中,对溶栓时间的诊断心电图(ECG)中值要比在快速通道政策下接受的救护车转诊或GP转诊更长。诊断ECG溶栓时间:意外和紧急事件50 分钟(范围15至385);救护车转诊中位33分钟(范围6至69); GP转诊的中位数为29.5分钟(5到110分钟); (与救护车转诊相比,p = 0.056的事故和紧急情况,与GP转诊相比与p <0.002的事故和紧急情况)。在100例转诊的救护车中,有52位患者表现出缺血性心脏病的症状(确诊为AMI,不稳定型心绞痛和心绞痛),另外18位患者因其他心脏问题需要留在CCU。因此,与260例(55.8%)的GP转诊病例中的155例相比,总共70例(sup> (70%)被认为是合适的。

关键词:直接入院冠状动脉护理;可疑的心肌梗塞患者的入院,而不会不利地影响入院的适当性。溶栓时间;救护人员

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号