首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of General Practice >Psychiatric screening in general practice: comparison of the general health questionnaire and the hospital anxiety depression scale
【2h】

Psychiatric screening in general practice: comparison of the general health questionnaire and the hospital anxiety depression scale

机译:一般实践中的精神病筛查:一般健康状况调查表与医院焦虑抑郁量表的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The prevalence of psychiatric disorder in 100 patients attending their general practitioner was found to be 33% based on the criteria of the DSM-3 diagnostic system. Using the DSM-3 diagnosis as a yardstick, the performance of the hospital anxiety depression scale was compared with that of the general health questionnaire. Relative operating coefficient analysis showed good discrimination between `cases' and `non-cases' for both questionnaires, and the optimum threshold score was found to be eight for the hospital anxiety depression scale and five for the general health questionnaire. Using these threshold scores the positive predictive value was 81% for the hospital anxiety depression scale and 77% for the general health questionnaire. The hospital anxiety depression scale appeared more sensitive than the general health questionnaire (90% versus 77%) and simpler to complete. In addition, it does not require a different threshold score for each population studied. The use of screening questionnaires in general practice is discussed.
机译:根据DSM-3诊断系统的标准,发现100名全科医生的精神疾病患病率为33%。以DSM-3诊断为标准,比较了医院焦虑抑郁量表和一般健康问卷的表现。相对工作系数分析显示,两种问卷的“病例”和“非病例”之间都有很好的区分,医院焦虑抑郁量表的最佳阈值得分为8,而一般健康问卷的最佳阈值得分为5。使用这些阈值得分,医院焦虑抑郁量表的阳性预测值为81%,而一般健康问卷的阳性预测值为77%。医院焦虑抑郁量表似乎比一般健康调查表更为敏感(分别为90%和77%),并且更易于完成。此外,对于每个研究人群,它都不需要不同的阈值得分。讨论了筛选问卷在一般实践中的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号