首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Raising the benchmark for the 21st century—the 1000 cataract operations audit and survey: outcomes Consultant‐supervised training and sourcing NHS choice
【2h】

Raising the benchmark for the 21st century—the 1000 cataract operations audit and survey: outcomes Consultant‐supervised training and sourcing NHS choice

机译:提高21世纪的基准-1000次白内障手术审核和调查:结果顾问指导的培训和NHS选择的来源

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PurposeClinical outcomes for phacoemulsification surgery are still compared with the almost 10‐year‐old benchmark of the 1997–98 National Cataract Surgery Survey (NCSS) published in this journal. Extraneous to the peer‐reviewed research literature, more recent databases suggest much better results may be being obtained. This offered the rare opportunity to perform an audit as research investigating if this was indeed the case and a new benchmark is needed, with the additional standard of rigorous study peer review by independent senior ophthalmologists. At this pilot centre for Patient Choice provision, all cataract surgery was performed on Consultant‐supervised training lists, a novel extension in‐sourcing care using public resources rather than to an independent sector that may not be supervised by NHS Consultants. Patient satisfaction was also surveyed. We asked whether the NCSS is out‐of‐date, and whether good outcomes on Choice schemes are compatible with Consultant‐led training within the National Health Service?
机译:目的仍将超声乳化手术的临床结局与本杂志发表的1997-98年全国白内障手术调查(NCSS)近10年的基准进行比较。与同行评审的研究文献不同,最新的数据库表明可能会获得更好的结果。这提供了难得的机会,可以进行调查,以调查是否确实如此,是否需要新的基准,以及由独立高级眼科医生进行的严格的研究同行评审标准。在这个提供患者选择的试点中心,所有白内障手术均在顾问监督的培训清单上进行,这是一种新颖的扩大内包医疗服务,使用的是公共资源,而不是扩展到不受NHS顾问监督的独立部门。还对患者满意度进行了调查。我们询问了NCSS是否过时,以及“选择”计划的良好结果是否与国家卫生局内部由顾问主导的培训兼容?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号