首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Cost utility of photodynamic therapy for predominantly classic neovascular age related macular degeneration
【2h】

Cost utility of photodynamic therapy for predominantly classic neovascular age related macular degeneration

机译:光动力疗法主要用于经典的新血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的成本效用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Background/aim: Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of severe vision impairment and blindness in older people throughout the developed world and currently affects around 420 000 UK citizens. Choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) is treatable with photodynamic therapy (PDT) but is expensive at over £1200 per treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the cost utility of PDT for better eye, predominantly classic, subfoveal choroidal neovascular lesions secondary to AMD.>Methods: Cost utility analysis (CUA) was conducted to estimate the cost effectiveness of PDT for scenarios involving reasonable (6/12) and poor (6/60) visual acuity. The models incorporated data from the Treatment of Age-related Macular Degeneration with PDT (TAP) Study and patient based utilities. The incremental CUA was based on decision analytical models, comparing treatment to a placebo comparator. Extensive one way sensitivity analysis of parameters was conducted to determine the robustness of the model. A discount rate of 6% was used for costs and quality adjusted life years (QALY).>Results: Model 1: in people with reasonable initial visual acuity, the cost utility of treating applicable neovascular AMD lesions was £31 607 per QALY saved, with a sensitivity analysis range from £25 285 to £37 928. Model 2: in people with poor initial visual acuity, the cost utility was £63 214 per QALY saved, with a sensitivity analysis range from £54 183 to £75 856.>Conclusions: PDT treatment is the only available treatment for some forms of neovascular (“wet”) AMD. Under these assumptions, PDT can be considered moderately cost effective for those with reasonable visual acuity but less cost effective for those with initial poor visual acuity. These findings have implications for ophthalmic practice and healthcare planning.
机译:>背景/目的:与年龄相关的黄斑变性(AMD)是整个发达国家老年人严重视力障碍和失明的主要原因,目前影响着约42万英国公民。脉络膜新生血管形成(CNV)可通过光动力疗法(PDT)治疗,但价格昂贵,每次治疗超过1200英镑。这项研究的目的是评估PDT对继发于AMD的更好的眼(主要是经典的,黄斑下脉络膜新生血管病变)的成本效用。>方法:进行了成本效用分析(CUA)以评估成本效益对于涉及合理(6/12)和较差(6/60)视力的场景的PDT评估。这些模型结合了PDT(TAP)研究治疗老年性黄斑变性的数据和基于患者的效用。增量CUA基于决策分析模型,将治疗与安慰剂比较剂进行比较。进行了广泛的一种参数敏感性分析,以确定模型的鲁棒性。对于成本和质量调整生命年(QALY),使用6%的折现率。>结果:模型1:在具有合理初始视敏度的人群中,治疗可应用的新血管AMD病变的成本效用为£每节省QALY 31 607次,敏感性分析范围为25 285英镑至37 928英镑。模型2:在初始视敏度较差的人群中,每节省QALY成本效益为63 214英镑,敏感性分析范围为54英镑183至75 856英镑。>结论: PDT治疗是某些形式的新生血管(“湿性”)AMD的唯一​​可用治疗方法。在这些假设下,对于具有合理视力的患者,PDT可以被认为具有中等成本效益,而对于那些初期视力较差的患者而言,PDT的成本效益却较低。这些发现对眼科实践和医疗保健计划有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号