首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Extracapsular cataract surgery compared with manual small incision cataract surgery in community eye care setting in western India: a randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Extracapsular cataract surgery compared with manual small incision cataract surgery in community eye care setting in western India: a randomised controlled trial

机译:印度西部社区眼保健机构中的囊外白内障手术与人工小切口白内障手术的比较:一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aim: To study “manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS)” for the rehabilitation of cataract visually impaired and blind patients in community based, high volume, eye hospital setting; to compare the safety and effectiveness of MSICS with conventional extracapsular cataract surgery (ECCE).Methods: In a single masked randomised controlled clinical trial, 741 patients, aged 40–90 years, with operable cataract were randomly assigned to receive either MSICS or ECCE and operated upon by one of eight participating surgeons. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were graded and scored according to the Oxford Cataract Treatment and Evaluation Team recommendations. The patients were followed up at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 1 year after surgery and their visual acuity recorded.>Results: This paper reports outcomes at 1 and 6 weeks. 706 of the 741(95.3%) patients completed the 6 week follow up. 135 of 362 (37.3%) of ECCE group and 165 of 344 (47.9%) of MSICS group had uncorrected visual acuity of 6/18 or better after 6 weeks of follow up. 314 of 362 (86.7%) of ECCE group and 309 of 344 (89.8%) of MSICS group had corrected postoperative vision of 6/18 or better. Four of 362 (1.1%) of ECCE group and six of 344 (1.7%) of MSICS group had corrected postoperative visual acuity less than 6/60. There were no significant differences between the two groups for intraoperative and severe postoperative complications.>Conclusion: MSICS and ECCE are both safe and effective techniques for treatment of cataract patients in community eye care settings. MSICS needs similar equipment to ECCE, but gives better uncorrected vision.
机译:>目标:研究“手动小切口白内障手术(MSICS)”,以社区,大容量,眼科医院环境中的白内障视力障碍和失明患者的康复情况;方法:在一项单项掩盖的随机对照临床试验中,将741名年龄在40-90岁,患有可手术性白内障的患者随机分配接受MSICS或ECCE治疗,以比较MSICS与常规白内障白内障手术(ECCE)的安全性和有效性。由八名参与手术的医生之一进行手术。根据牛津白内障治疗和评估小组的建议对术中和术后并发症进行评分和评分。分别在术后1周,6周和1年对患者进行随访,并记录他们的视力。>结果:本文报道1周和6周的结果。 741名患者中的706名(95.3%)完成了6周的随访。 ECCE组362名中的135名(37.3%)和MSICS组344名中的165名(47.9%)在随访6周后的未矫正视力为6/18或更高。 ECCE组362名中的314名(86.7%)和MSICS组中344名309名(89.8%)的术后视力矫正率为6/18或更高。 ECCE组的362名患者中有4名(1.1%),MSICS组的344名患者中有6名(1.7%)术后视力低于6/60。两组在术中和术后严重并发症方面无显着差异。>结论: MSICS和ECCE都是在社区眼保健机构中治疗白内障患者的安全有效技术。 MSICS需要与ECCE类似的设备,但可以提供更好的未矫正视力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号