首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Quantifying relative afferent pupillary defects using a Sbisa bar
【2h】

Quantifying relative afferent pupillary defects using a Sbisa bar

机译:使用Sbisa棒量化相对传入瞳孔缺损

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aim: To compare the Sbisa bar (Bagolini filter bar) with neutral density filters (NDF) in quantifying relative afferent pupillary defects (RAPD).>Methods: 11 patients with a RAPD were graded and a neutral density filter bar was used to quantify the RAPD. This was repeated using the Sbisa bar. The Sbisa bar (Bagolini filter bar) is used by orthoptists to quantify density of suppression in amblyopia and is of a similar construct to NDFs. Before this clinical part of the study the luminance for each filter was measured, which enabled a direct comparison to be made.>Results: In the analysis of patients with RAPD a high correlation was found when comparing the Sbisa and NDF bars r = 0.95. This was statistically significant (p = <0.001). Correlation was also high when the luminance values for the filters were substituted for the clinical readings (r = 0.92; p=<0.001).>Conclusion: The Sbisa bar is a comparable instrument to the NDF bar in measuring RAPD. Its availability in the clinical situation makes it a practical choice.
机译:>目标:将Sbisa条(Bagolini过滤条)与中性密度过滤器(NDF)进行比较,以量化相对传入瞳孔缺损(RAPD)。>方法::11例RAPD患者分级,并使用中性密度滤棒对RAPD进行定量。使用Sbisa条重复该操作。骨科医师使用Sbisa条(Bagolini过滤条)来量化弱视的抑制密度,其构造与NDF类似。在该研究的临床部分之前,先测量每个滤光片的亮度,从而可以进行直接比较。>结果:在RAPD患者的分析中,比较Sbisa和NDF条r = 0.95。这具有统计学意义(p = <0.001)。当用滤光片的亮度值代替临床读数时,相关性也很高(r = 0.92; p = <0.001)。>结论: Sbisa棒在测量时可与NDF棒媲美RAPD。它在临床上的可用性使其成为一种实用的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号