首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Tritan colour contrast sensitivity function in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses
【2h】

Tritan colour contrast sensitivity function in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses

机译:屈光性多焦点人工晶状体的Tritan彩色对比敏感度功能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIMS—To compare tritan colour contrast sensitivity (CCS), without and with glare, in patients with refractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and with monofocal intraocular lenses.
METHODS—Tritan CCS was determined (Moorfields Vision System, CH Electronics) in 15 eyes (14 patients, 75.7 (±6.6) years) with a refractive multifocal IOL (Allergan SA 40N) and in 11 eyes (10 patients, 73.7 (±6.4) years) with a monofocal IOL (Allergan SI 40 NB). Measurements were made monocularly under mesopic conditions at a distance of 2 metres from the monitor with best distance refraction plus 0.5 D at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 11.4, and 22.8 cycles per degree (cpd). The test was then repeated for the multifocal IOLs, adding minus 2.5 D to the best distance refraction to force the patient to use the near focus. Both lenses were also investigated under glare conditions with the same set-up and using the brightness acuity tester (BAT).
RESULTS—The tritan CCS function without glare in multifocal lenses through the distance focus was nearly identical to that through the near focus. The following statistically significant differences were measured: the CCS function without glare for the multifocal lens was worse at 0.5 cpd and 1.0 cpd than that of the monofocal lens. In CCS testing of the multifocal group with glare at 6 cpd, the results through the distance focus were better than the results through the near focus. For the CCS function with glare, the values for the distance focus in the multifocal lens were worse than the values for the monofocal lens at 0.5 cpd and 1 cpd. In CCS testing with glare through the near focus and CCS testing through the monofocal lens, the monofocal lens performed better at 0.5 cpd, 1 cpd, 3 cpd, and 6 cpd.
CONCLUSION—Refractive multifocal intraocular lenses influence tritan CCS function compared to monofocal lenses.

机译:目的:比较具有屈光性多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)和单焦点人工晶状体的患者在不使用眩光和不使用眩光的情况下的Tritan彩色对比灵敏度(CCS)。
方法—确定了Tritan CCS(Moorfields视觉系统,CH Electronics )屈光性多焦点IOL(Allergan SA 40N)在15眼(14例患者,75.7(±6.6)岁)和单眼IOL(Allergan SI 40)在11眼(10例患者,73.7(±6.4)岁) 。在介观条件下以单眼的方式在距显示器2米的距离处进行测量,最佳距离折射加0.5 D以0.5、1、3、6、11.4和22.8个循环(cpd)的度数进行。然后针对多焦点IOL重复该测试,在最佳距离折射上加上负2.5 D,以迫使患者使用近焦点。在相同的设置和使用亮度敏锐度测试仪(BAT)的眩光条件下,还对这两种镜片进行了研究。
结果-在远焦距情况下,多焦距镜片的tritan CCS功能几乎没有眩光。近焦点。测量了以下统计学上的显着差异:在0.5cpd和1.0cpd下,多焦点镜片的无眩光CCS功能比单焦点镜片更差。在6 cpd眩光的多焦点组的CCS测试中,远距离聚焦的结果优于近聚焦聚焦的结果。对于具有眩光的CCS功能,在0.5 cpd和1 cpd的情况下,多焦点镜头中的远距焦距值比单焦点镜头的差。在通过近焦点进行眩光的CCS测试和通过单焦点镜片进行CCS测试中,单焦点镜片在0.5 cpd,1 cpd,3 cpd和6 cpd上的性能更好。
结论—与单焦点晶状体相比,折射多焦点人工晶状体会影响tritan CCS功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号