首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Pharmacological mydriasis and optic disc examination
【2h】

Pharmacological mydriasis and optic disc examination

机译:药理散瞳和视盘检查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM—To determine whether pharmacological mydriasis leads to a significant difference in interobserver agreement of optic disc measurement compared with examination without mydriasis.
METHOD—A cross sectional study was performed with a pair of observers examining the optic disc of two randomised groups of patients, one group before diagnostic mydriasis, and the other afterwards. Horizontal and vertical disc diameters and cup/disc ratios were measured with a 78 dioptre lens. The study was repeated with another observer pair and two further groups of patients.
RESULTS—In study A 86 subjects were examined in total (52 without and 34 with mydriasis). In study B 87 subjects were examined (45 without and 42 with mydriasis). The 95% limits of agreement of the cup/disc ratio measurement differences were significantly larger without mydriasis (p<0.001 for all studies (F test)). For both studies examination after mydriasis gave significantly greater agreement for vertical and horizontal cup/disc ratios. The cases with good agreement (0.1 difference or better) for vertical cup/disc ratios were 37/52 (72%) and 34 /45 (76%) without mydriasis and 33/34 (97%) and 40/42 (95%) respectively with mydriasis. Similar differences were recorded for horizontal cup/disc ratios. Disc diameter measurement results showed similar differences in study A but were not affected by mydriasis in study B.
CONCLUSIONS—Examination of the optic disc without pharmacological mydriasis gives significantly poorer interobserver agreement. In this study, the mean 95% limits of agreement values for all cup/disc ratio values were 0.27 for examination without mydriasis and 0.13 for examination with mydriasis. A measure outside these limits would suggest a real difference. This study indicates that mydriasis is important for reproducible clinical examination in glaucoma.

机译:目的—为了确定药理学上的散瞳与没有散瞳的检查相比,是否在观察者之间导致了视盘测量的显着差异。
方法—一项横断面研究由一对观察者检查了两个随机组的视盘患者,一组诊断为瞳孔散大,另一组为诊断散瞳。使用78倍屈光度透镜测量水平和垂直盘直径以及杯/盘比。结果与另一对观察者对和另外两组患者重复进行。
结果-在研究中,总共检查了86个受试者(52个散瞳和34个散瞳散瞳)。在研究B中,检查了87位受试者(45 无和42位瞳孔散大)。没有散​​瞳的情况下,杯碟比测量差异的95%一致极限明显更大(所有研究的p <0.001(F检验))。对于这两个研究,散瞳后的检查对于垂直和水平杯/盘的比率都具有更大的一致性。垂直杯/盘比率具有良好一致性(差异0.1或更好)的病例为37/52(72%)和34/45(76%)无瞳孔散大和33/34(97%)和40/42(95%) )分别与瞳孔散大。对于水平杯/盘比率,记录了相似的差异。椎间盘直径测量结果显示,研究A具有相似的差异,但不受研究B中散瞳的影响。
结论—检查无药理散瞳的视盘会明显降低观察者之间的一致性。在这项研究中,所有杯/盘比率值的协议值的平均95%限值在无散瞳检查中为0.27,在散瞳检查中为0.13 。超出这些限制的措施将表明存在真正的差异。这项研究表明,散瞳对青光眼的可重复临床检查很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号