首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The British Journal of Ophthalmology >Use of a grading system in the evaluation of complications in a randomised controlled trial on cataract surgery. Oxford Cataract Treatment and Evaluation Team (OCTET).
【2h】

Use of a grading system in the evaluation of complications in a randomised controlled trial on cataract surgery. Oxford Cataract Treatment and Evaluation Team (OCTET).

机译:在白内障手术的随机对照试验中使用分级系统评估并发症。牛津白内障治疗和评估小组(OCTET)。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A randomised controlled trial in progress for more than five years assessed 333 eyes by three methods of cataract surgery. These were (A) intracapsular extraction and contact lens usage; (B) intracapsular extraction and implantation of an iris supported lens (Federov I); and (C) extracapsular extraction and implantation of an iridocapsular lens (Binkhorst 2-loop). This paper reports the use of a weighting scale for rank scoring complications which are dissimilar or are mutually exclusive (for example, capsular versus contact lens problems) to allow the use of non-parametric statistics for comparing disparate features. Thus we found that group B did significantly worse in terms of the number and severity of postoperative complications, a trend in accordance with visual results. This method may serve as a useful model for similar studies.
机译:一项进行了五年以上的随机对照试验通过三种白内障手术方法评估了333只眼。这些是(A)囊内提取和隐形眼镜的使用; (B)虹膜支持的晶状体(Federov I)的囊内提取和植入; (C)虹膜囊状晶状体(Binkhorst 2环)的囊外提取和植入。本文报告了使用加权量表对不相似或互斥的等级评分并发症(例如,囊与隐形眼镜问题进行比较),以允许使用非参数统计来比较不同的特征。因此,我们发现B组的术后并发症的数量和严重程度明显恶化,这一趋势与视觉结果一致。这种方法可以作为类似研究的有用模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号